Frequency of Pre-Analytical Errors and Its Causes in Glucose Specimen Collection: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36283//ziun-pjmd14-3/002Keywords:
Glucose, Specimen Collection, Blood Collection, Quality ControlAbstract
Background: The laboratory testing process comprises the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases. The pre-analytical phase has the highest frequency of error among these three stages. The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of pre-analytical errors and the reasons behind them in the collection of glucose specimens.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study (039-DME-QAMC) was carried out on 225 samples collected at the Pathology Department of Bahawal Victoria Hospital in Bahawalpur between July and December of 2024. The method of non-probability sequential sampling was applied. Samples from indoor departments, patients who did not give their informed consent, and any stored specimens were not included. All information on pre-analytical problems, including hemolyzed samples, quantity insufficient, improper centrifugation, delayed processing, and labeling errors, has been meticulously documented by the lead researcher in the proforma. During the data collection process, quality control procedures were in place to ensure accuracy and consistency. SPSS Ver. 25 was used to enter and analyze all of the data. The data's normality was examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Results: In this study, frequency of preanalytical errors in glucose specimen collection process is 20% with delayed specimens (9.3%, n=21) is the most common, while other errors like inappropriate centrifugation (3.1%, n=7), hemolyzed samples (2.7%, n=6) and sample quantity insufficient (QNS) were 1.8% (n=4).
Conclusion: This study highlighted the need for sodium fluoride tubes for the delayed processing specimens to prevent in vitro glycolysis, proper blood collection techniques, and timely specimen handling in proper ways to minimize errors.
References
1. Tasneem A, Zubair M, Rasool Z, Tareen FZ. Frequency and types of pre-analytical errors in a clinical laboratory of a specialized healthcare hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan;40(2ICON Suppl): S70-S74. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.2(ICON).8963.
2. Nordin N, Ab Rahim SN, Wan Omar WFA, Zulkarnain S, Sinha S, Kumar S, et al. Preanalytical Errors in Clinical Laboratory Testing at a Glance: Source and Control Measures. Cureus. 2024 Mar 30;16(3):e57243. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57243.
3. Wiencek JR, Pierre CC, Füzéry AK. Environmental factors in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing. Clin Biochem. 2023 May;115(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.03.006.
4. John GK, Favaloro EJ, Austin S, Islam MZ, Santhakumar AB. From errors to excellence: the pre-analytical journey to improved quality in diagnostics. A scoping review. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jan:1(1);1-10. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1277.
5. Li B, Cai X, Zhan L, Zhang X, Lin Y, Zeng J. Quality Control Circle Practices to Reduce Specimen Rejection Rates. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Oct 26;17(1):4925-4935. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S486276.
6. Nichols ZE, Geddes CD. Sample Preparation and Diagnostic Methods for a Variety of Settings: A Comprehensive Review. Molecules. 2021 Sep 18;26(18):5666. doi: 10.3390/molecules26185666.
7. Cadamuro J, Simundic AM. The preanalytical phase - from an instrument-centred to a patient-centred laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Nov 4;61(5):732-740. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1036.
8. Tapper MA, Pethick JC, Dilworth LL, McGrowder DA. Pre-analytical Errors at the Chemical Pathology Laboratory of a Teaching Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):16-18. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30159.10378.
9. Gupta P, Thomas M, Sbetan N, Chacko G, Savarimuthu I, Cherian P, et al. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Rejected Laboratory Samples and Enhance Specimen Acceptability. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Aug;47(8):519-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.04.005.
10. du Toit M, Chapanduka ZC, Zemlin AE. The impact of laboratory staff training workshops on coagulation specimen rejection rates. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268764. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268764.
11. Gajjar D, Agravatt A, Khubchandani A, Parchwani DN. Evaluation of Laboratory Performance in Consideration of Pre-analytical and Post-analytical Quality Indicators. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024 Apr;39(2):264-270. doi: 10.1007/s12291-022-01094-0.
12. Kani V, Kannan K, Arumugam S, Sonti S. Preanalytical Errors in Hematology: Insights From a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2024 Sep 18;16(9):e69641. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69641.
13. Thachil A, Wang L, Mandal R, Wishart D, Blydt-Hansen T. An Overview of Pre-Analytical Factors Impacting Metabolomics Analyses of Blood Samples. Metabolites. 2024 Aug 28;14(9):474. doi: 10.3390/metabo14090474.
14. van Rossum HH. Technical quality assurance and quality control for medical laboratories: a review and proposal of a new concept to obtain integrated and validated QA/QC plans. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2022 Dec;59(8):586-600. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2022.2088685.
15. Bodley T, Levi O, Chan M, Friedrich JO, Hicks LK. Reducing unnecessary diagnostic phlebotomy in intensive care: a prospective quality improvement intervention. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Aug;32(8):485-494. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015358.
16. Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power, and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical, and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502.
17. Kitchen S, Adcock DM, Dauer R, Kristoffersen AH, Lippi G, Mackie I, et al. International Council for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for the collection of blood samples for coagulation testing. Int J Lab Hematol. 2021 Aug;43(4):571-580. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13584.
18. Jha PK, Agarwal R. Quality Tools and Strategy for Critical Alerts Process Improvements to Ensure Patient Safety. J Lab Physicians. 2022 Jun 28;14(4):471-478. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1747677.
19. Wen X, Leng P, Wang J, Yang G, Zu R, Jia X, et al. Clinlabomics: leveraging clinical laboratory data by data mining strategies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Sep 24;23(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04926-1.
20. Giussani M, Sirini S, Padoan A, Bonini C, Meyer B, Morelli D. Evaluation of a novel blood collection set for venipuncture in oncology patients with difficult venous access: Impact on sample quality, phlebotomist satisfaction and patient pain perception. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct;72:102680. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102680.
21. Kirwan JA, Gika H, Beger RD, Bearden D, Dunn WB, Goodacre R, et al. Quality assurance and quality control reporting in untargeted metabolic phenotyping: mQACC recommendations for analytical quality management. Metabolomics. 2022 Aug 27;18(9):70. doi: 10.1007/s11306-022-01926-3.
22. Chang J, Lim J, Chung JW, Sohn YH, Jang MJ, Kim S. Status of Pre-analytical Quality Management of Laboratory Tests at Primary Clinics in Korea. Ann Lab Med. 2023 Sep 1;43(5):493-502. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.493.
23. Mehndiratta M, Pasha EH, Chandra N, Almeida EA. Quality Indicators for Evaluating Errors in the Preanalytical Phase. J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jun;13(2):169-174. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729473.
24. Janik-Karpinska E, Brancaleoni R, Niemcewicz M, Wojtas W, Foco M, Podogrocki M, et al. Healthcare Waste Serious Problem for Global Health. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;11(2):242. Doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020242.
25. Schwartz M, Osborn H, Palmieri J, Patel B, Flug JA. Reducing Errors in Radiology Specimen Labeling Through Use of a Two-person Check. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020 Sep-Oct;49(5):351-354. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metrics
How to Cite
