Age‑Based Differences in Syncope: Incidence, Diagnostic Challenges, and Treatment Strategies in Paediatric vs. Adult Populations Attending a Tertiary Cardiac Center in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd15-2/007Keywords:
cardiac syncope, paediatrics, syncopeAbstract
Background:
Syncope presents a frequent diagnostic dilemma, particularly in low-resource settings like Pakistan, where age-related variations in presentation and management are poorly characterised. This study sought to compare the clinical profiles, triggers, and recurrence predictors of syncope across paediatric and adult populations attending a tertiary cardiac centre.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, from January 2024 to May 2025. Using non-probability consecutive sampling, 220 patients with recent-onset syncope were enrolled, including 90 paediatric and 130 adult participants. Standardised clinical evaluations and investigations, including ECG, echocardiography, and laboratory parameters, were performed. Data were analysed using Shapiro–Wilk for normality, followed by t-test, Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, and logistic regression for group comparisons and predictors of recurrence.
Results:
The mean age of participants was 33.1 ± 18.7 years, with males comprising 55.9%. Vasovagal syncope was most prevalent (50.5%), and cardiac syncope was more frequent in adults (χ² = 22.03, p < 0.001). Adults showed higher serum glucose (163.5 mg/dL, IQR: 128.1–201.4, p < 0.001) and electrolyte levels (138.7 mEq/L, IQR: 137.2–140.9, p = 0.017). Syncope recurrence occurred in 19.1% and was significantly associated with cardiac syncope (OR 3.21, p = 0.001), abnormal echocardiography (OR 2.94, p = 0.007), and psychiatric comorbidity (OR 1.87, p = 0.042). Positive correlations were observed between glucose and episode frequency (ρ = 0.364, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Significant clinical, biochemical, and diagnostic differences were identified between paediatric and adult syncope patients. Cardiac involvement and psychosocial factors emerged as key predictors of recurrence, underscoring the need for age-tailored syncope assessment pathways in Pakistani tertiary care settings.
References
1. Shahid G, Iqbal R, Khan A, Akbar J, Ahmed M, Malik F. Frequency and Aetiology of Syncope in Patients Presenting to Emergency Departments in Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(3):310-314. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2021.03.310
2. Ramakrishnan S, Mishra S, Mukhopadhyay S, Bansal M, Pande A, Kaul U. Syncope: The Indian perspective – Results of a multicentre registry. Indian Heart J. 2019;71(3):212–217. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2019.03.001
3. Jayasinghe R, Arambepola C, Perera K, Fernando D, Munasinghe P, Wijeratne Y. Pattern of syncope presentations to a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):5. doi:10.1186/s12872-021-02433-6
4. Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, Deharo JC, Elliott PM, Fanciulli A, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(21):1883–1948. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037
5. Sandhu RK, Sheldon RS. Syncope. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(5):ITC65–ITC80. doi:10.7326/AITC202105040
6. Dipaola F, Barberi S, Barretta F, Russo G, Martino F, Antuzzi D, et al. Age-related differences in presentation and management of syncope in a paediatric and adult population. Pediatr Cardiol. 2020;41(7):1364–1371. doi:10.1007/s00246-020-02393-w
7. Shen WK, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, Cohen MI, Forman DE, Goldberger ZD, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(5):e39-e110. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.003
8. Uher T, Bob P, Hlustik P, Kukal J, Fialová L, Tintera J, et al. Cognitive consequences of syncope: A review. J Neurol Sci. 2020;408:116579. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2019.116579
9. Ungar A, Mussi C, Del Rosso A, Noro G, Ceccofiglio A, Giada F, et al. Diagnosis and characteristics of syncope in older patients referred to geriatric departments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(1):140–146. doi:10.1111/jgs.16869
10. Malik M, Nasir SB, Rauf A, Sarwar H, Kundi A, Bukhari MH. Assessment of syncope cases in cardiology units of public sector hospitals in Punjab. Pak Heart J. 2020;53(2):143–147. doi:10.47144/phj.v53i2.1452
11. Solbiati M, Casazza G, Dipaola F, Rusconi AM, Cernuschi G, Barbic F, et al. Syncope recurrence and mortality: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e007395. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007395
12. Khan NU, Shaikh S, Ahmed W, Siddiqui A, Nasir A, Ali SS. Pattern of Syncope Presentations in Emergency Departments in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(6):1303-1307. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.6.1681
13. Javed MA, Shahbaz A, Saeed U, Hassan A, Rafique A, Munir R. Frequency of Syncope and Its Causes in Adults Presenting to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi. Pak Heart J. 2019;52(4):282-286. https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v52i4.898
14. Ramakrishnan S, Mishra S, Mukhopadhyay S, Bansal M, Pande A, Kaul U. Syncope: The Indian perspective – Results of a multicentre registry. Indian Heart J. 2019;71(3):212-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2019.03.001
15. Jayasinghe R, Arambepola C, Perera K, Fernando D, Munasinghe P, Wijeratne Y. Pattern of syncope presentations to a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02433-6
16. Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, Deharo JC, Elliott PM, Fanciulli A, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(21):1883–1948. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037
17. Del Rosso A, Ungar A, Maggi R, Giada F, Petix NR, De Santo T, et al. EGSYS score and outcome in syncope: a validation study. Heart. 2021;107(7):562-568. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317296
18. Massin MM, Bourguignont A, Coremans C, Comté L, Lepage P, Gérard P. Syncope in pediatric patients presenting to an emergency department. J Pediatr. 2020;221:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.035
19. Emdin CA, Anderson SG, Callender T, Conrad N, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Woodward M, et al. Usual blood pressure and risk of new-onset diabetes: evidence from 4.1 million adults and a meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(14):1552–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.059
20. Pilz S, Tomaschitz A, Ritz E, Pieber TR. Vitamin D status and arterial hypertension: a systematic review. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(10):621-630. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2009.132
21. Toma A, Moulinet T, Prévot M, Maignan M, Claret PG, Debaty G. Syncope in emergency departments: clinical presentation and diagnostic accuracy of initial evaluation. Eur J Emerg Med. 2022;29(3):211–217. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000883
22. Sheldon RS, Raj SR, Morillo CA, Krahn AD, Andrade JG, Talajic M, et al. Standardized approaches to the investigation of syncope: Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(6):722–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.03.010
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metrics
How to Cite
