Frequency of Spontaneous Onset of Labour in Patient with PROM For 24 Hours at LRH, Peshawar

Authors

  • Khizran Mohib Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar,Pakistan.
  • Ayesha Iqbal Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar / Maqsood Medical Complex,Pakistan.
  • Afshan Gul Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Shadab Shakir Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar,Pakistan.
  • Ikram Ullah Zeb Medical and Dental College, Timergara, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/054

Keywords:

Pregnancy, Premature rupture of membranes, Spontaneous onset of labor

Abstract

Background: Adequate amniotic fluid volume is vital for fetal well-being, and its reduction may indicate premature rupture of membranes (PROM), which can affect pregnancy outcomes. PROM occurs when the amniotic membranes rupture before labor begins. This study aims to determine the frequency of spontaneous labor onset in patients with PROM lasting 24 hours.

Methods: This descriptive case series was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from 1st May to 1st November 2021, to determine the frequency of spontaneous labor within 24 hours in women with PROM. A total of 148 women aged 18–40 years, with singleton pregnancies at 37–40 weeks, were enrolled through non-probability consecutive sampling. Women with chorioamnionitis, diabetes, previous cesarean section, cephalopelvic disproportion, malpresentation, or intrauterine fetal death were excluded. Demographic data (age, gestational age, parity, weight) were collected, and patients were monitored for 24 hours for spontaneous labor; induction or cesarean section was performed if indicated. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23 with descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests (p ≤ 0.05). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.

Results: Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 40 years (mean: 28.59±2.58). The mean gestational age was 38.26±0.93 weeks, with a mean parity of 1.53±1.45, and a mean weight of 69.62±4.38 Kg. Spontaneous labor onset occurred in 64.2% of the patients within 24 hours.

Conclusion: A 24-hour observation period for spontaneous labor onset in PROM cases can be safely conducted before inducing labor at term, allowing for natural progression



Author Biographies

  • Khizran Mohib, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar,Pakistan.

    Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics,

  • Ayesha Iqbal, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar / Maqsood Medical Complex,Pakistan.

    Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics,

  • Afshan Gul, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

    Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics,

  • Shadab Shakir, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar,Pakistan.

    Consultant, IMC

  • Ikram Ullah, Zeb Medical and Dental College, Timergara, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan.

    Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics and Senior Registrar, 

References

1. Ramirez Montesinos L, Downe S, Ramsden A. Systematic review on the management of term prelabour rupture of membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov;23:650. doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05878-x. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-023-05878-x

2. Ağaoğlu RT, Öztürk Ö, Ulusoy CO, et al. Perinatal outcomes and predictors of neonatal mortality in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a tertiary center experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Sep;25:585. doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07688-9. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-025-07688-9

3. Bellussi F, et al. Term prelabor rupture of membranes: immediate induction is the optimal management. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Oct;5(10):101094. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101094. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2589933323002367

4. Abu Shqara R, Strauss R. Time Matters: Evaluating the Clinical and Infectious Outcomes in Rupture of Membranes <12 Hours versus 12–18 Hours, at Term: A Retrospective Study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025 Jan;82(1):xx-xx. doi:10.1159/000548662. Available from: https://karger.com/goi/article/doi/10.1159/000548662/936019

5. Garg A, Jaiswal A. Evaluation and Management of Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Review Article. Cureus. 2023 Mar;15(3):e36615. doi:10.7759/cureus.36615. Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/36615-evaluation-and-management-of-premature-rupture-of-membranes-a-review-article

6. Wolde M, Mulatu T, Alemayehu G, et al. Predictors and perinatal outcomes of pre labor rupture of membrane among pregnant women admitted to a university hospital, Eastern Ethiopia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul;13:1269024. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1269024. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1269024/full

7. Panahi Z, Abbas W, Ghotbizadeh Vahdani F, Shariat M. Relationships Between Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane at Gestational Age 20–36+6 Weeks and Perinatal Outcomes: A Cross sectional Study from Tehran, Iran. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2025 May;13(3):e147968. doi:10.5812/apid-147968. Available from: https://brieflands.com/articles/apid-147968

8. Goodfellow L, et al. Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes before 23 weeks’ gestation: maternal and perinatal outcomes. BMJ Med. 2024 Feb;3:e000729. doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000729. Available from: https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000729

9. Grill A, et al. Neonatal outcomes following previable rupture of membranes below 23 weeks’ gestation. Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Mar;184:503–514. doi:10.1007/s00431-025-06324-0. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00431-025-06324-0

10. Abu Shqara R, Rosso L, Lowensetin L, Wolf MF. Maternal and perinatal infectious morbidity in term prelabor rupture of membrane according to two induction of labor protocols. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May;312:1577–1585. doi:10.1007/s00404-025-06789-3. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-06789-3

11. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Green-top Guideline No. 73: Care of Women Presenting with Suspected Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes from 24+0 Weeks of Gestation. 2022 [updated Oct 2024]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg73/

12. Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA. Planned early birth versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (≥37 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan;CD005302. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub4. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub4/full

13. Caughey AB, Robinson JN, Norwitz ER. Contemporary diagnosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:11–22. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2459180/

14. Brown RG, Marchesi JR, Lee YS, et al. Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm foetal membranes rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin. BMC Med. 2018 Jan;16:9. doi:10.1186/s12916-018-0970-7. Available from: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-018-0970-7

15. Nath J. A clinical study on expectant management versus induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2016;5:00156. doi:10.15406/ogij.2016.05.00156. Available from: https://medcraveonline.com/OGIJ/A-clinical-study-on-expectant-management-versus-induction-of-labour-in-term-premature-rupture-of-membranes-PROM.html

16. Marconi AM. Recent advances in the induction of labor. F1000Res. 2019 Nov;8:F1000 Faculty Rev-1829. doi:10.12688/f1000research.20799.1. Available from: https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1829/v1

17. Reuter S, Moser C, Baack M. Respiratory distress in the newborn. Pediatr Rev. 2014 Oct;35:417–428. doi:10.1542/pir.35-10-417. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25288494/

18. Cammu H, et al. Comparison of outcomes in delayed vs. early PROM induction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1986;22:201–209. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3740419/

19. Wagner M, Guise JM. PROM observation and induction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 1986;1:23–28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3510580/

20. Malik Z, Tabassum S, Zainab S, Manzoor A. Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Induction of Labour with Expectant Management in Patients with term Prelabour Rupture of Membranes. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2023 Jul;73(SUPPL-1):S174–S178. doi:10.51253/pafmj.v73iSUPPL 1.4354. PAFMJ

21. Jayashalini S. A Retrospective Study on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Premature Rupture of Membranes. J Neonatal Surg. 2025;14(8s):60–68. doi:10.52783/jns.v14.2495. J Neonatal Surg+1

22. Kaur EJ, Mansingh S, Rai G. Prelabour rupture of membranes: A study of fetal and maternal outcomes with expectant management. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;5(2):87–90. doi:10.33545/gynae.2021.v5.i2b.872. Gynecology Journal+1

23. Ahmed RHM, Sweed MSE, El-Bishry GA, et al. Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Pregnant Women with Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Reprod Sci. 2023;30:3507–3514. doi:10.1007/s43032-023-01290-0.

24. Gunn GC, et al. Intrapartum infections in PROM patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1968;32:1–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5646390/

25. Webb J. Maternal mortality in PROM cases. Br Med J. 1967;3:152–154. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6026351/

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Mohib K, Iqbal A, Gul A, Shakir S, Ullah I. Frequency of Spontaneous Onset of Labour in Patient with PROM For 24 Hours at LRH, Peshawar. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 29 [cited 2026 Jun. 4];14(4). Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/4155

Similar Articles

81-90 of 121

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.