Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy Versus Open Conversion as a Bailout Strategy in Complicated Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Zeeshan Azam Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi
  • Iffat Noureen Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi
  • Abdur Rehman Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6118-717X
  • Rai Amir Wazir Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi
  • Huma Sabir Khan Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi
  • Usman Qureshi Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd15-1/022

Keywords:

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Cholecystectomy, Gallbladder Diseases , Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications

Abstract

Background: Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), due to inflammation or unclear anatomy, increases complication risk, such as bile duct injury. In such scenarios, surgeons adopt bailout strategies—either laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC). In resource-limited settings, evidence comparing these options remains scarce. This study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of LSC and OC as bailout strategies for difficult LC in a resource-constrained tertiary care setting in Pakistan.

Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, enrolling 34 patients who underwent either LSC (n=28) or OC (n=6) between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients were selected based on intraoperative difficulty criteria. Primary outcome was procedural success; secondary outcomes included bile leakage, surgical site infections, 30-day mortality, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis included t-tests and chi-square tests with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: Both groups achieved 100% procedural success. No bile leakage, organ space infections, or 30-day mortality occurred in either group. LSC demonstrated significantly shorter operative time (78.4±15.2 min vs. 102.5±18.7 min, p=0.01) and slightly shorter hospital stay. Superficial surgical site infections were fewer in the LSC group but not statistically significant.

Conclusion: In resource-limited settings, both LSC and OC offer comparable safety and efficacy. LSC may offer advantages in operative time and invasiveness. Surgeon expertise and intraoperative judgment should guide strategy selection.

Author Biographies

  • Zeeshan Azam, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi

    Surgical Unit II

  • Iffat Noureen, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi

    Surgical Unit II

  • Abdur Rehman, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi

    Surgical Unit II

  • Rai Amir Wazir, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi

    Surgical Unit II

  • Huma Sabir Khan, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi

    Surgical Unit II

  • Usman Qureshi, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi

    Surgical Unit II

References

1. Wang X, Yu W, Jiang G, Li H, Li S, Xie L, et al. Global Epidemiology of Gallstones in the 21st Century: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2024 Aug;22(8):1586–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01342-9

2. Farda W, Tani MK, Manning RG, Fahmi MS, Barai N. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of 1430 cases in Cure International Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan. BMC Surg. 2021 Dec;21(1):344. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01342-9

3. Lucocq J, Scollay J, Patil P. Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 20;5(9):e2232171. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32171

4. Függer R. Challenging situations in cholecystectomy and strategies to overcome them. European Surgery. 2021 Jun;53(3):106-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00687-4

5. Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepato Biliary Pancreat. 2018 Jan;25(1):73–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.517

6. Reinsoo A, Kirsimägi Ü, Kibuspuu L, Košeleva K, Lepner U, Talving P. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomies: an 11-year population-based study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct;49(5):2269–76. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02190-9

7. Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, Sorge R, Al-Hamali S, Ebdewi H. Subtotal Cholecystectomy for “Difficult Gallbladders”: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2015 Feb 1;150(2):159. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1219

8. Mannino M, Toro A, Teodoro M, Coccolini F, Sartelli M, Ansaloni L, et al. Open conversion for laparoscopically difficult cholecystectomy is still a valid solution with unsolved aspects. World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec;14(1):7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0227-4

9. Pacilli M, Sanchez-Velázquez P, Abad M, Luque E, Burdio F, Ielpo B. Minimally invasive subtotal cholecystectomy. What surgeons need to know. Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2709–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01995-0

10. Djote SM, Muhie DA, Alemayehu GD. Advancing laparoscopy in resource-limited settings. BMC Surg. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02387-2

11. Al-Azzawi M, Abouelazayem M, Parmar C, Singhal R, Amr B, Martinino A, et al. A systematic review on laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: a lifesaving bailout or an incomplete operation? annals. 2024 Mar;106(3):205–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2023.0008

12. Ábrahám S, Németh T, Benkő R, Matuz M, Váczi D, Tóth I, et al. Evaluation of the conversion rate as it relates to preoperative risk factors and surgeon experience: a retrospective study of 4013 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMC Surg. 2021 Dec;21(1):151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01152-z

13. Purzner RH, Ho KB, Al-Sukhni E, Jayaraman S. Safe laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the face of severe inflammation in the cystohepatic triangle: a retrospective review and proposed management strategy for the difficult gallbladder. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2019 Dec;62(6):402. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014617

14. Shimoda M, Kuboyama Y, Suzuki S. Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1611–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01266-w

15. Bansal A, Mahobia HS, Waghoikar G. A clinical study to determine predictive factors for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. International Journal of Surgery. 2020 Oct;4(4):126-32. https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i4c.547

16. Grossman H, Holder KG, Freedle C, Dhanasekara CS, Dissanaike S. Comparing Outcomes of Sub-Total Cholecystectomy Versus Open Cholecystectomy as Bailout Procedures for the Difficult Gallbladder. The American SurgeonTM. 2023 Dec;89(12):5372–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348221148345

17. Koo SS, Krishnan RJ, Ishikawa K, Matsunaga M, Ahn HJ, Murayama KM, Kitamura RK. Subtotal vs total cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Surgery. 2024 Mar 1;229:145-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.12.022

18. Choi WJ, Mansour M, Gomez D. Falciform Patch for Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy to Decrease Biliary Fistulas: A Technique Review. Annals of Surgery. 2021 Jun;273(6):e278–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004827

19. Koo JG, Chan YH, Shelat VG. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques. Surgical endoscopy. 2021 Mar;35(3):1014-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08096-0

20. Badve SB, Turcotte J, Brennan JC, Klune J, Feather CB, Rehrig S, Kulkarni SS. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Conversion to Open and Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy in the Difficult Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. The American Surgeon™. 2025 May;91(5):819-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251318380

21. Nzenwa IC, Mesri M, Lunevicius R. Risks associated with subtotal cholecystectomy and the factors influencing them: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies published between 1985 and 2020. Surgery. 2021 Oct;170(4):1014–23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.036

22. Kara Y, Kalayci MU. Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: The Risk Factors and the Reasons; A Retrospective Analysis of 1950 Cases of a Single Tertiary Center. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2020 Apr;30(2):192–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000716

23. Kurtulus I, Culcu OD, Degerli MS. Which Is More Effective: Laparoscopic or Open Partial Cholecystectomy? Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2022 May 1;32(5):476–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0300

24. Lim SH, Tan HT, Shelat VG. Comparison of indocyanine green dye fluorescent cholangiography with intra-operative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy. 2021 Apr;35:1511-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08164-5

25. Ie M, Katsura M, Kanda Y, Kato T, Sunagawa K, Mototake H. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for grade II or III acute cholecystitis. BMC surgery. 2021 Dec;21:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01387-w

Downloads

Published

2026-01-14

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Azam Z, Noureen I, Rehman A, Wazir RA, Khan HS, Qureshi U. Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy Versus Open Conversion as a Bailout Strategy in Complicated Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. PJMD [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 14 [cited 2026 Jun. 5];15(1). Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/4138

Similar Articles

61-70 of 302

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)