Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Pituitary Micro-Adenoma, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

Authors

  • Sehar Sarfraz Doctors Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Tayyaba Ali Islamabad Diagnostic Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Pakeeza Shafiq Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia, KSA
  • Zartashia Khan Al Khalid Hospital, Rahim yar khan, Pakistan
  • Waqar Azeem Isra University, Hyderabad, Pakistan
  • Ghazala Rasool Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia, KSA
  • Ehsan Ul Haq Free University of Berlin, Germany.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-1/012

Keywords:

Pituitary Microadenoma, Non-Contrast MRI, Histopathology, Endocrine Tumors

Abstract

Background: Pituitary microadenomas (PMs) are common benign tumors that are often not visualized even when they are present due to their asymptomatic nature. The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of pituitary microadenomas using histopathology as a gold standard.

Methods: This cross-sectional validation study (IRB Approval No. IRB/18/2024/01) included 121 patients presenting with severe headaches and focal brain lesions on CT scans at Doctors Hospital, Lahore from September 2024 to November 2024. In this cross-sectional study, a non-probability consecutive sampling technique was used. A standardized protocol was used for non-contrast MRI and findings were interpreted by experienced radiologists. The comparison was made against histopathology as the reference standard. A 2×2 contingency table was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy by using SPSS version 25.

Results: Of 121 patients (mean age 40.74 ± 10.35 years), 70 (57.9%) were females. Non-contrast MRI showed a sensitivity and specificity of 37.25% (38/102) and 89.47% (17/19) respectively. Specificity is high, meaning that the modality is reliable in eliminating false positives, but sensitivity is low, which means that it won’t find true positives correctly. The percentage of diagnostic accuracy was 45.5% (55/121) which showed that the technique had room for significant improvement.

Conclusion: Pituitary microadenomas can be clinicopathologically screened using non-contrast MRI as an initial radiation-free diagnostic modality with minimal ionizing and contrast agents-based risk being valuable for long-term monitoring.

Author Biographies

  • Sehar Sarfraz, Doctors Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Radiology

  • Tayyaba Ali, Islamabad Diagnostic Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Department of Histopathology, 

  • Pakeeza Shafiq, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia, KSA

    Department of Surgery, 

  • Zartashia Khan, Al Khalid Hospital, Rahim yar khan, Pakistan

    Department of Pathology,

  • Waqar Azeem, Isra University, Hyderabad, Pakistan

    Department of Pathology,

  • Ghazala Rasool, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia, KSA

    Department of General Medicine,

  • Ehsan Ul Haq, Free University of Berlin, Germany.

    Faculty of Medicine OVGU Magdeburg

References

Sabahi M, Yousefi O, Kehoe L, Sasannia S, Gerndt C, Adada B, et al. Correlation Between Pituitary Adenoma Surgery and Anxiety Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery. 2024 Apr 30. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.154

Papazoglou AS, Leite AR, Moysidis DV, Anastasiou V, Daios S, Borges-Canha M, et al. Serum prolactin levels and mortality in adults without prolactinoma: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2024 Feb 15:dgae087. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae087

Cai Y, Liu S, Zhao X, Ren L, Liu X, Gang X, et al. Pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment of plurihormonal pituitary adenoma. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2024 Jan 8;17:1323883. doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1323883

Shafiq I, Williams ZR, Vates GE. Advancement in perioperative management of pituitary adenomas—Current concepts and best practices. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2024 Nov;36(11):e13427. doi:10.1111/jne.13427

Korbonits M, Blair JC, Boguslawska A, Ayuk J, Davies JH, Druce MR, et al. Consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: Part 2, specific diseases. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2024 May;20(5):290-309. doi:10.1038/s41574-024-00791-2

Yuen KC, Ghalib L, Buchfelder M, Hughes J, Langlois F, Molitch ME. Surveillance imaging strategies for pituitary adenomas: when, how frequent, and when to stop. Endocrine Practice. 2024 Mar 1;30(3):282-91. doi:10.4158/EP-2023-0292

Starekova J, Pirasteh A, Reeder SB. Update on gadolinium-based contrast agent safety, from the AJR special series on contrast media. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2024 Sep 18;223(3):e2330036. doi:10.2214/AJR.23.30099

Yao X, Hu J, Wang G, Lin X, Sun J, Dong G, et al. Deposition of gadolinium in the central and peripheral nervous systems and its effects on sensory, cognitive, and athletic implications after multiple injections of gadolinium-based contrast agents in rats. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2024 Aug 1;45(8):1153-61. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7810

Guo T, Luan J, Gao J, Liu B, Shen T, Yu H, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of pituitary microadenoma on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI based on spatio-temporal features. Expert Systems with Applications. 2025 Jan 15;260:125414. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125414

Yunusa DM, Usman UA, Ibrahim A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pituitary Microadenoma: A Case Series. Gombe Medical Journal. 2024 Aug 12;1(1):30-3. doi: Not available

Mak D, Breidbart E, Mehta S, Kohn B. Surveying Current Practices in the Use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents for Routine Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency among US Pediatric Endocrinologists. Hormone Research in Paediatrics. 2024 Sep 30:1-4. doi:10.1159/000541661/4292377/000541661

Zheng B, Zhao Z, Zheng P, Liu Q, Li S, Jiang X, et al. The current state of MRI-based radiomics in pituitary adenoma: promising but challenging. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2024 Sep 20;15:1426781. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1426781

Battistella A, Tacelli M, Mapelli P, Schiavo Lena M, Andreasi V, Genova L, et al. Recent developments in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2024 May 3;18(4-5):155-69. doi:10.1080/17474124.2024.2342837

Samardzija A, Selvaganesan K, Zhang HZ, Sun H, Sun C, Ha Y, et al. Low-Field, Low-Cost, Point-of-Care Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2024 Jan 11;26.doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110122-022903

Zilka T, Benesova W. Radiomics of pituitary adenoma using computer vision: a review. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2024 Jul 16:1-7. doi:10.1007/s11517-024-03163-3

Ujala B, Shabbir I, Fatima N. The mean relative signal intensity ratio (SIR) difference in patients undergoing dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) for diagnosis of pituitary microadenoma. The Professional Medical Journal. 2024 Feb 7;31(02):222-9. doi:10.29309/TPMJ/2024.31.02.7922

Dénes J, Korbonits M. The clinical aspects of pituitary tumour genetics. Endocrine. 2021 Mar;71:663-74. doi:10.1007/s12020-021-02633-0

Benzon HT, Maus TP, Kang HR, Provenzano DA, Bhatia A, Diehn F, et al. The use of contrast agents in interventional pain procedures: a Multispecialty and multisociety practice Advisory on nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, gadolinium deposition in the brain, encephalopathy after unintentional intrathecal gadolinium injection, and hypersensitivity reactions. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2021 Aug 1;133(2):535-52. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005443

Gadelha MR, Barbosa MA, Lamback EB, Wildemberg LE, Kasuki L, Ventura N. Pituitary MRI standard and advanced sequences: role in the diagnosis and characterization of pituitary adenomas. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2022 May 1;107(5):1431-40. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab901

Castle-Kirszbaum M, Amukotuwa S, Fuller P, Goldschlager T, Gonzalvo A, Kam J, et al. MRI for cushing disease: A systematic review. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2023 Mar 1;44(3):311-6. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7789

Giardina G, Micko A, Bovenkamp D, Krause A, Placzek F, Papp L, et al. Morpho-molecular metabolic analysis and classification of human pituitary gland and adenoma biopsies based on multimodal optical imaging. Cancers. 2021 Jun 29;13(13):3234. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133234

Barbosa MA, Pereira EG, da Mata Pereira PJ, Guasti AA, Andreiuolo F, Chimelli L, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging does not seem to be a predictor of consistency in pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2024 Jan 25:1-0. doi:10.1007/s11102-023-01377-6

Pecoraro M, Messina E, Bicchetti M, Carnicelli G, Del Monte M, Iorio B, et al. The future direction of imaging in prostate cancer: MRI with or without contrast injection. Andrology. 2021 Sep;9(5):1429-43. doi: 10.1111/andr.13041

Eisenhut F, Schlaffer SM, Hock S, Heynold E, Kremenevski N, Bluemcke I, et al. Ultra-high-field 7 T magnetic resonance imaging including dynamic and static contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging improves detection of secreting pituitary microadenomas. Investigative Radiology. 2022 Sep 1;57(9):567-74. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000872

Gruppetta M. A current perspective of pituitary adenoma MRI characteristics: a review. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2022 Nov 2;17(6):499-511. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2022.2144230

Downloads

Published

2025-01-10

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Sarfraz S, Ali T, Shafiq P, Khan Z, Azeem W, Rasool G, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Pituitary Micro-Adenoma, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 10 [cited 2026 Jun. 3];14(1):74-80. Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/3421

Similar Articles

21-30 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)