Salivary Biomarkers for the Early Detection and Prognostic Stratification of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Authors

  • Hafiz Waqas Ahmed Mayo Hospital/ King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Munazza Kafait Lahore Specialists Clinic, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Ayesha Rais Sandeman Provincial Hospital ,Bolan University of Medical and Health Sciences (BUMHS) in Quetta, Balochistan.
  • Zakia Yaqoob Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Bolan University of Medical and Health Sciences (BUMHS) in Quetta, Balochistan.
  • Bilal Basit Rashid Latif Dental College , Lahore,Pakistan.
  • Javeria Saleem Green International University, Lahore, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/069

Keywords:

Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Salivary Biomarkers , EGFR, IL-8, miR-1246, Proteomics, Transcriptomics, ROC curve

Abstract

Introduction: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains a major public health burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Traditional diagnostic modalities are often invasive and fail to detect early-stage disease. Saliva, as a non-invasive and readily accessible diagnostic fluid, has gained increasing attention for its potential to reflect molecular changes associated with malignancy. This study explores the diagnostic and prognostic utility of salivary biomarkers—spanning genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, exosomal, and metabolomic classes—in patients with OSCC. To assess the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of selected salivary biomarkers for OSCC using logistic regression analysis and stage-wise correlation.

Methods: This multicenter case-control study enrolled 400 participants: 200 confirmed OSCC cases, 120 patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), and 80 healthy controls. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected and analyzed using qPCR, ELISA, and mass spectrometry for key biomarkers including EGFR, p53, IL-8, Ki-67, miR-423-5p, miR-1246, CYFRA 21-1, SAT1, NUS1, sialic acid, and exosomal EGFR. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate associations between biomarker levels and OSCC risk, while ROC curves assessed diagnostic accuracy (AUC).

Results: Logistic regression revealed strong associations between elevated salivary levels of exosomal miR-1246 (OR=2.90, 95% CI: 2.10–3.75), IL-8 (OR=2.10, 95% CI: 1.55–2.80), EGFR (OR=2.45, 95% CI: 1.80–3.34), and miR-423-5p (OR=2.70, 95% CI: 1.95–3.50) with OSCC presence (p < 0.001). Exosomal markers demonstrated >90% diagnostic accuracy (AUC > 0.90), outperforming genomic and proteomic markers. Stage-wise analysis showed increasing expression trends for IL-8, Ki-67, and p53 from stage I to IV. Combined biomarker panels improved diagnostic prediction, with integrated models yielding AUCs > 0.95.

Conclusion: Salivary biomarkers—particularly from transcriptomic and exosomal categories—offer high diagnostic and prognostic value for OSCC. Logistic modeling supports their clinical use in non-invasive screening, especially in early-stage disease. This approach can significantly enhance early detection, reduce morbidity, and improve survival outcomes.

Author Biographies

  • Hafiz Waqas Ahmed, Mayo Hospital/ King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Registrar,

  • Munazza Kafait, Lahore Specialists Clinic, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of  Laser Dental Surgery, 

     

     

  • Ayesha Rais, Sandeman Provincial Hospital ,Bolan University of Medical and Health Sciences (BUMHS) in Quetta, Balochistan.

    Department of Oral &  Maxillofacial Surgery,

  • Zakia Yaqoob, Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Bolan University of Medical and Health Sciences (BUMHS) in Quetta, Balochistan.

    Department of Oral &  Maxillofacial Surgery,

  • Bilal Basit, Rashid Latif Dental College , Lahore,Pakistan.

    Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Senior Registrar,

     

References

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

2. Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(4–5):309–16.

3. Zhang L, Xiao H, Wong DT. Salivary biomarkers for clinical applications. Mol Diagn Ther. 2009;13(4):245–59.

4. Lee YH, Wong DT. Saliva: an emerging biofluid for early detection of diseases. Am J Dent. 2009;22(4):241–8.

5. Gupta S, Sethi A, Khan M, et al. Saliva: a tool for early detection of oral cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2020;24(2):247–52.

6. Ghallab NA, Shaker OG, Hassan RH. Salivary microRNAs as promising diagnostic biomarkers in oral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;49(6):523–30.

7. Wolff A, Joshi RK, Ekström J, et al. A guide to collecting saliva samples for proteomic analysis. Oral Dis. 2015;21(6):739–51.

8. Guerrero-Preston R, Michailidi C, Marchionni L, et al. Key tumor suppressor genes inactivated by “benign” promoter hypermethylation. Cancer Res. 2014;74(15):4174–82.

9. Zain RB. Cultural and dietary risk factors of oral cancer and precancer – a brief overview. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(3):205–10.

10. Patel RS, Jakymiw A, Yao B, et al. High resolution of microRNA signatures in human whole saliva. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56(12):1506–13.

11. Momen-Heravi F, Trachtenberg AJ, Kuo WP, Cheng YS. Genomewide study of salivary microRNAs for detection of oral cancer. J Dent Res. 2014;93(7 Suppl):86S–93S.

12. Ishikawa S, Sugito N, Ueda M, et al. Serum miR-21 and miR-29a as biomarkers of oral squamous cell carcinoma progression. Oncotarget. 2021;12(7):689–700.

13. Wu Y, Gu Y, Han X, et al. Diagnostic value of salivary exosomal microRNAs for the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):1–13.

14. Arellano-Garcia ME, Hu S, Wang J, et al. Multiplexed immunobead-based assay for detection of oral cancer protein biomarkers in saliva. Oral Dis. 2008;14(8):705–12.

15. Jou YJ, Hua CH, Lin CD, et al. CYFRA 21-1 as a prognostic marker in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(9–10):760–5.

16. Vashist S, Goswami M, Kumar P. Salivary biomarkers of oral cancer—an overview. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2021;25(2):327–36.

17. Zlotogorski-Hurvitz A, Dayan D, Chaushu G, et al. Salivary exosomal microRNAs as potential biomarkers for oral cancer detection and prognosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20(9):1652–9.

18. Liao J, Yu L, Mei Y, et al. Exosomal miRNAs in human saliva as novel biomarkers for detection of oral cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;50(5):1829–40.

19. Sugimoto M, Wong DT, Hirayama A, et al. Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry-based saliva metabolomics identified oral, breast and pancreatic cancer-specific profiles. Metabolomics. 2010;6(1):78–95.

20. Ishikawa S, Sugimoto M, Kitabatake K, et al. Identification of salivary metabolomic biomarkers for oral cancer screening. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31520.

21. Markopoulos AK. Current aspects on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Open Dent J. 2012;6:126–30.

22. Mahmood H, Akram Z, Sabiha S, et al. Salivary interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 levels in oral cancer patients from Pakistan: a case-control study. J Oral Sci. 2021;63(3):245–9.

23. Wang K, Zhang H, Zhang J, et al. Salivary transcriptomic and proteomic biomarkers for diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer. 2020;11(4):1105–14.

24. Sinha N, Mukhopadhyay S, Das D, et al. Salivary proteome signatures in oral cancer: a mass spectrometry-based study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3466.

25. Yang J, Wei J, Li Y, et al. The exosomal miR-1246 promotes oral cancer cell proliferation and migration by targeting DENND2D. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(2):1281–90.

26. Malathi N, Mythili S, Vasanthi HR. Salivary diagnostics: a brief review. ISRN Dent. 2014;2014:158786.

27. He Q, Zhang C, Wang Y, et al. Salivary exosomal biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma detection: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;165:103434.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Ahmed HW, Kafait M, Rais A, Yaqoob Z, Basit B, Saleem J. Salivary Biomarkers for the Early Detection and Prognostic Stratification of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 29 [cited 2026 Jun. 4];14(4). Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/4206

Similar Articles

61-70 of 678

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.