Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With and Without Prior Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis

Authors

  • Muhammad Waleed Khan CMH, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Talha Khan Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Shahid Majeed CMH, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Raheel Khan CMH, Lahore, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/011

Keywords:

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Percutaneous, Acute Cholecystitis, Postoperative Complications, Surgical Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common surgical emergency in Pakistan. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard treatment, but percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is often used in high-risk patients as a temporizing measure before interval LC. The impact of prior PC on operative and postoperative outcomes in our setting remains unclear. The study aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of interval LC performed with and without prior PC in patients with AC.

Methods: This comparative observational study at CMH Lahore (Dec 2024–July 2025) included 120 patients: Group A (LC without prior PC, n = 60) and Group B (LC with prior PC, n = 60). Outcomes included operative time, adhesion severity, subtotal cholecystectomy rates, conversion rates, recovery parameters, and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses used Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Group B patients were significantly older (58.3 ± 10.5 vs 45.6 ± 11.2 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of ASA II–III status (60.0% vs 33.3%, p = 0.004) compared to Group A. Operative time was shorter in Group B (65.4 ± 12.5 vs 78.9 ± 15.6 minutes, p < 0.001), with fewer cases of severe adhesions (6.7% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of subtotal cholecystectomy (3.3% vs 13.3%, p = 0.048). Recovery was faster in Group B, with earlier oral intake, shorter hospital stays (2.8 ± 1.0 vs 4.5 ± 1.4 days, p < 0.001), and lower—but not statistically significant—overall complication rates (5.0% vs 13.3%, p = 0.098).

Conclusion: Prior PC in AC patients was associated with reduced operative difficulty, fewer severe adhesions, shorter operative time, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer complications, although differences in complication rates were not statistically significant. PC remains a safe and effective bridging intervention for selected high-risk patients when immediate LC is not feasible.

 

 

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Waleed Khan, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of General Surgery

  • Muhammad Talha Khan, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of General Surgery 

  • Shahid Majeed, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of General Surgery

  • Raheel Khan, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of General and Thoracic Surgery

References

1. Coelho JCU, Costa MARD, Enne M, Torres OJM, Andraus W, Campos ACL. Acute Cholecystitis In High-Risk Patients. Surgical, Radiological, Or Endoscopic Treatment? Brazilian College Of Digestive Surgery Position Paper. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023 Sep 15;36:e1749. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020230031e1749.

2. Haseeb M, Hassan S, Ayub A, Ali MA, Shakir MJ, Farooq MS. Cross Sectional Evaluation of Pre-operative Predictive Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 21 [cited 2025 Aug. 9];14(3). Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/3884

3. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Pitt HA, Umezawa A, Asai K, Han HS, Hwang TL, Mori Y, Yoon YS, Huang WS, Belli G, Dervenis C, Yokoe M, Kiriyama S, Itoi T, Jagannath P, Garden OJ, Miura F, Nakamura M, Horiguchi A, Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, de Santibañes E, Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Wada K, Honda G, Supe AN, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Gouma DJ, Deziel DJ, Liau KH, Chen MF, Shibao K, Liu KH, Su CH, Chan ACW, Yoon DS, Choi IS, Jonas E, Chen XP, Fan ST, Ker CG, Giménez ME, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Inui K, Sumiyama Y, Yamamoto M. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516

4. Ullah N, Kannan V, Ahmed O, Geddada S, Ibrahiam AT, Al-Qassab ZM, Malasevskaia I. Effectiveness and Safety of Cholecystectomy Versus PC for Acute Cholecystitis in Older and High-Risk Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):e70537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70537

5. Ghali MS, Ali SM, Gibreal KJ, Singh R, Shehata MS, Al-Zoubi RM, Zarour A. Indications and clinical outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomies in acute cholecystitis: a study from Qatar. BMC surgery. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):100. https://bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12893-025-02765-4

6. Khan SJ, Asif M, Aslam S, Khan WJ, Hamza SA. Pakistan's Healthcare System: A Review of Major Challenges and the First Comprehensive Universal Health Coverage Initiative. Cureus. 2023 Sep 4;15(9):e44641. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44641

7. Ahmed SH, Zahid M, Waseem S, Zafar A, Shaikh TG, Sabri T, Arshad A. The current state of primary healthcare in Pakistan: a way forward for low-to-middle income countries. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Oct 31;25:e59. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000549

8. Kurji Z, Premani ZS, Mithani Y. Analysis of the health care system of Pakistan: lessons learnt and way forward. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016;28(3):601. https://ecommons.aku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1281&context=pakistan_fhs_son

9. Malik A, Laghari AA, Talpur KA, Memon A, Mallah Q, Memon JM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in empyema of gall bladder: An experience at Liaquat University Hospital, Jamshoro, Pakistan. J Minim Access Surg. 2007 Apr;3(2):52-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.33273

10. Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K, Borzellino G, Cimbanassi S, Boerna D, Coccolini F, Tufo A, Di Martino M, Leung J, Sartelli M. 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World journal of emergency surgery. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. https://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x

11. Abdallah HS, Sedky MH, Sedky ZH. The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review. BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02847-3

12. Raja S, Ali A, Kumar D, Raja A, Samo KA, Memon AS. Early vs. interval approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective observational study from Pakistan. Front Surg. 2024 Sep 6;11:1462885. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1462885

13. Bressan L, Cimino MM, Vaccari F, Capozzela E, Biloslavo A, Porta M, Bortul M, Kurihara H. Preoperative Waiting Time Affects the Length of Stay of Patients Treated via Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in an Acute Care Surgical Setting. J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 29;13(23):7263. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237263

14. Lee O, Shin YC, Ryu Y, Yoon SJ, Kim H, Shin SH, Heo JS, Jung W, Lim CS, Han IW. Comparison between percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and upfront laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderate-to-severe acute cholecystitis: a propensity score-matched analysis. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research. 2023 Nov 1;105(5):310-8. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.105.5.310

15. Ahmad H, Arnaert A, Shedio W, Tanoli O, Deckelbaum D, Pasha T. Enhanced recovery after surgery in Pakistan: a qualitative descriptive analysis of current practices and future directions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):1634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11569-w

16. Alidina S, Chatterjee P, Zanial N, Alreja SS, Balira R, Barash D, Ernest E, Giiti GC, Maina E, Mazhiqi A, Mushi R, Reynolds C, Sydlowski M, Tinuga F, Maongezi S, Meara JG, Kapologwe NA, Barringer E, Cainer M, Citron I, DiMeo A, Fitzgerald L, Ghandour H, Gruendl M, Hellar A, Jumbam DT, Katoto A, Kelly L, Kisakye S, Kuchukhidze S, Lama TN, Menon G, Mshana S, Reynolds C, Segirinya H, Simba D, Smith V, Staffa SJ, Strader C, Tibyehabwa L, Troxel A, Varallo J, Wurdeman T, Zurakowski D. Improving surgical quality in low-income and middle-income countries: why do some health facilities perform better than others? BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Dec;30(12):937-949. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011795

17. Hung YL, Sung CM, Fu CY, Liao CH, Wang SY, Hsu JT, Yeh TS, Yeh CN, Jan YY. Management of patients with acute cholecystitis after PC: from the acute stage to definitive surgical treatment. Frontiers in surgery. 2021 Apr 15;8:616320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.616320

18. Kourounis G, Rooke ZC, McGuigan M, Georgiades F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of early vs late interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy following PC. HPB (Oxford). 2022 Sep;24(9):1405-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.03.016

19. Fanciulli G, Favara G, Maugeri A, Barchitta M, Agodi A, Basile G. Comparing percutaneous treatment and cholecystectomy outcomes in acute cholecystitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2025 Jun 7;20(1):50. https://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13017-025-00622-6

20. Pesce A, Ramirez-Giraldo C, Arkoudis NA, Ramsay G, Popivanov G, Gurusamy K, Bejarano N, Bellini MI, Allegritti M, Tesei J, Gemini A. Management of high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis following PC: results of an international Delphi consensus study. International Journal of Surgery. 2025 May 1;111(5):3185-92. https://journals.lww.com/international-journal-of-surgery/fulltext/2025/05000/management_of_high_surgical_risk_patients_with.5.aspx

21. Hess GF, Sedlaczek P, Haak F, Staubli SM, Muenst S, Bolli M, Zech CJ, Hoffmann MH, Mechera R, Kollmar O, Soysal SD. Persistent acute cholecystitis after cholecystostomy–increased mortality due to treatment approach?. HPB. 2022 Jun 1;24(6):963-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.006

22. Ramia JM, Serradilla-Martín M, Villodre C, Rubio JJ, Rotellar F, Siriwardena AK, Wakabayashi G, Catena F. International Delphi consensus on the management of percutaneous choleystostomy in acute cholecystitis (E-AHPBA, ANS, WSES societies). World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2024 Oct 12;19(1):32. https://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13017-024-00561-8

23. Lu P, Chan CL, Yang NP, Chang NT, Lin KB, Lai KR. Outcome comparison between PC and cholecystectomy: a 10-year population-based analysis. BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0327-6

24. Teke E, Ağca B, Güneş Y, Teke GN, Yaz AS, Aydın MT, Başak A, Yıldırım G. PC in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: Factors influencing mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery/Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2025 Jan 1;31(1). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11843392/

25. Yadav S, Ramesh R, Sheikh Z, Padala HSS, Shashank C, Kalsi J, Pandey PR. Assessment of Postoperative Complications and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2595-S2597. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_232_24

26. Kaya C, Bozkurt E, Ömeroğlu S, Yazıcı P, İdiz UO, Tabakçı ÖN, Bostancı Ö, Mihmanlı M. Is Interval Cholecystectomy Necessary After PC in High-Risk Acute Cholecystitis Patients? Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2018 Mar 26;52(1):13-18. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.30092

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Khan MW, Khan MT, Majeed S, Khan R. Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With and Without Prior Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 29 [cited 2026 Jun. 4];14(4). Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/4194

Similar Articles

41-50 of 417

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.