Cerebral Flow Diverter: Pioneering Insights From A Tertiary Care Hospital In A Developing Nation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd15-1/005Keywords:
Aneurysm, cerebral, flow diverter, occlusion, stent.Abstract
Abstract:
Objective: To record the early experience about the cerebral flow diverters (CFD) utilization and outcomes at a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Place and duration: Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Material and methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent CFD placement for cerebral aneurysms at our tertiary care center between 2017 and 2025. Data collected included patient demographics, aneurysm features, procedural details, and both immediate and six-month post-procedure outcomes, such as occlusion rates and any complications. The extent of aneurysm occlusion—categorized as complete or incomplete—was determined based on angiographic imaging obtained immediately following CFD deployment.
Results: In a total of 27 patients, 16 (56.3%) were female and 11 (40.1%) male with mean age of 43.22 ± 17.86 years. The mean aneurysm size was calculated to be 17.87 ± 7.78 mm, whereas 22 (81.48%) were wide necked aneurysms (≥ 25 mm). Immediate post-procedural assessments displayed a 100% success rate in completing the intended procedure successfully across all 27 cases. Immediate angiogram revealed that 15 (55.56%) patients achieved complete contrast stasis/occlusion within the cerebral aneurysms, while 12 (44.4%) displayed partial contrast stasis/occlusion. In the shorter-term follow-up evaluation, 25 (92.59%) cases exhibited complete occlusion of the aneurysms with only 2 (7.41%) patients showing procedure failure, signifying a sustained positive outcome in terms of aneurysm closure. Complications were reported in 4 (4.2%) patients with 2 patients showing aneurysm wall enhancement, 1 patient showing acute thrombosis, and endoleak each.
Conclusion: Despite limited resources, our center achieved good clinical outcomes, aneurysm occlusion rates, and procedural success. The occurrence of complications in a subset of cases underscores the necessity for continued refinement of patient selection criteria and procedural techniques to optimize outcomes and mitigate risks in the evolving landscape of endovascular interventions for cerebral aneurysms.
References
1. Etminan N, Rinkel GJ. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management [published correction appears in Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Feb 1;13(2):126]. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(12):699-713. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.150
2. Lee KS, Zhang JJY, Nguyen V, Han J, Johnson JN, Kirollos R, er al. The evolution of intracranial aneurysm treatment techniques and future directions. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45(1):1-25. doi:10.1007/s10143-021-01543-z
3. Zhao J, Lin H, Summers R, Yang M, Cousins BG, Tsui J. Current treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysms: An Overview. Angiology. 2018;69(1):17-30. doi:10.1177/0003319717700503
4. Hadad S, Pradhan A, Kadirvel R, Kallmes D, Cebral JR, Mut F. Flow reversal in distal collaterals as a possible mechanism of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage after flow diversion treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Front Physiol. 2022;13:881627. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.881627
5. Qi P, Tong X, Liang X, Xue X, Wu Z, Feng X, er al. Flow diversion for posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2023;16:17562864231176187. doi:10.1177/17562864231176187
6. Shin DS, Carroll CP, Elghareeb M, Hoh BL, Kim BT. The evolution of flow-diverting stents for cerebral aneurysms; historical review, modern application, complications, and future direction. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020;63(2):137-152. doi:10.3340/jkns.2020.0034
7. Uchiyama Y, Fujimura S, Takao H, Suzuki T, Hayakawa M, Ishibashi T, er al. Hemodynamic investigation of the effectiveness of a two overlapping flow diverter configuration for cerebral aneurysm treatment. Bioengineering (Basel). 2021;8(10):143. doi:10.3390/bioengineering8100143
8. Masuda S, Fujimura S, Takao H, Takeshita K, Zuzuki T, Uchiyama Y, er al. Effects of different stent wire mesh densities on hemodynamics in aneurysms of different sizes. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0269675.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269675
9. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44(2):442-447. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151
10. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF. Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(2):171-177. doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4
11. Woolridge M, Fleeting C, Sarathy D, Patel D, Mizra B, Patel A, er al. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk following cerebral stent placement. Theranostics Brain Spine Neural Disord. 2023;4(4):555645.
12. Kim SO, Chung YG, Won YS, Rho MH. Delayed ischemic stroke after flow diversion of large posterior communicating artery aneurysm. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2016;18(1):19-26. doi:10.7461/jcen.2016.18.1.19
13. Wong GK, Kwan MC, Ng RY, Yu SC, Poon WS. Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status and ongoing clinical trials. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(6):737-740. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.011
14. Jing L, Zhong J, Liu J, X, Paliwal N, Meng H, er al. Hemodynamic Effect of Flow Diverter and Coils in Treatment of Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:199-207. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.079
15. Gao B, Zhang H, Lv X, Ostrowski RP, Li C. Editorial: Safety and efficacy of stents and flow diverters used for embolization of acutely-ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the acute stage. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1258677. doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1258677
16. Acosta JM, Cayron AF, Dupuy N, Pelli G, Foglia B, Haemmerli J, et al. Effect of aneurysm and patient characteristics on intracranial aneurysm wall thickness. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:775307. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.775307
17. Ikawa F, Hidaka T, Yoshiyama M, Ohba H, Matsuda S, Ozono I, et al. Characteristics of cerebral aneurysms in Japan. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019;59(11):399-406. doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2019-0099
18. Kim T, Lee H, Ahn S, Kwon O, Bang JS, Hwang G, et al. Incidence and risk factors of intracranial aneurysm: A national cohort study in Korea [published correction appears in Int J Stroke. 2017 Jun;12 (4):NP12]. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(8):917-927. doi:10.1177/1747493016660096
19. Binh NT, Luu VD, Thong PM, Cuong NN, Anh NQ, Tuan TA, et al. Flow diverter stent for treatment of cerebral aneurysms: A report of 130 patients with 134 aneurysms. Heliyon. 2020;6(2):e03356. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03356
20. Nam SM, Jang D, Wang KC, Kim S, Phi JH, Lee JY, et al. Characteristics and treatment outcome of intracranial aneurysms in children and adolescents. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019;62(5):551-560. doi:10.3340/jkns.2019.0140
21. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(1):34-40. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421
22. Burel J, Gerardin E, Vannier M, et al. Follow-up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Flow Diverters: Evaluation of Parent Artery Patency Using 3D-T1 Gradient Recalled-Echo Imaging with 2-Point Dixon in Combination with 3D-TOF-MRA with Compressed Sensing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43(4):554-559. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7448
23. Li YL, Roalfe A, Chu EY, Lee R, Tsang ACO. Outcome of flow diverters with surface modifications in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42(2):327-333. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6919
24. Yan Y, Zhu D, Tang H, Huang Q. Safety and dfficacy of flow diverter treatment for aneurysm in small cerebral vessels: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;115:54-64. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.009
25. Mpotsaris A, Skalej M, Beuing O, Eckert B, Behme D, Weber W. Long-term occlusion results with SILK flow diversion in 28 aneurysms: Do recanalizations occur during follow-up?. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(3):300-310. doi:10.1177/1591019915583119
26. Lv X. Editorial: Advances in flow-diversion devices for cerebral aneurysms. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1195367. doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1195367
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metrics
How to Cite
