Frequency Of Dyspareunia After Normal Vaginal Delivery With Episiotomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/057Keywords:
Episiotomy, dyspareunia, vaginal delivery, postpartum sexual dysfunction, PakistanAbstract
Background:Episiotomy, though widely practiced during vaginal delivery, remains controversial due to uncertain benefits and well-documented complications. Dyspareunia, or pain during sexual intercourse, is a significant yet under-recognized morbidity that can adversely affect postpartum quality of life. Local data on its frequency following episiotomy are limited in Pakistan.
To determine the frequency and severity of dyspareunia six weeks after normal vaginal delivery with episiotomy in women at a tertiary care center in Mardan, Pakistan.
Methods:This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 131 women aged 15–35 years who underwent normal vaginal delivery with mediolateral episiotomy at Bacha Khan Medical College/Mardan Medical Complex. Women with pre-existing gynecologic, obstetric, or medical conditions likely to confound outcomes were excluded. Dyspareunia was assessed at six weeks postpartum using the validated Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with pain severity classified as mild (1–3), moderate (4–6), or severe (>6). Data were analyzed using SPSS v19.0; frequencies, percentages, and stratified analyses (Chi-square/Fisher’s exact) were performed, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.
Results:Of 131 participants, 36 (27.5%) reported dyspareunia at six weeks postpartum. Most cases were classified as mild (13/131, 9.9%) or moderate (15/131, 11.5%), with severe pain in 8 (6.1%). No statistically significant associations were observed between dyspareunia and maternal age, BMI, education, residence, or neonatal factors. The majority of women reported resolution or substantial improvement of symptoms by the end of follow-up.
Conclusion: Dyspareunia is a common complication following episiotomy in this population, affecting more than one in four women at six weeks postpartum. While most cases are mild to moderate, the impact on postpartum recovery and quality of life is considerable. These findings underscore the
References
1. Minini G, Zanelli S, Inselvini P, Caria M, Grosso S, Quaresmini D. Mechanisms of pelvic floor trauma during vaginal delivery. Pelvic Floor Disord. 2019 May;137-41. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31093472/
2. Eskandar O, Shet D. Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Mar;29:119-22. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30715526/
3. Wheeler J, David D, Fry M, Brodie P, Homer C. Is Asian ethnicity an independent risk factor for severe perineal trauma in childbirth? Women Birth. 2018 Jun;25:107-13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29679209/
4. Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;200(5):573-7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.024. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30706561/
5. Euro-Peristat project with SCPE & EUROCAT. European perinatal health report: The health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2018. May 2020. Available from: https://www.tno.nl/downloads/European_perinatal_health_report_2018.pdf
6. Solana-Arellano E, Villegas-Arrizon A, Legorreta-Soberanis J. Women’s dyspareunia after childbirth: A case study in a hospital in Acapulco, Mexico. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019 Feb;23:44-51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30822711/
7. Sayasneh A, Pandey I. Postpartum sexual dysfunction: A literature review of risk factors and role of mode of delivery. BJMP. 2019 Jun;3(2):23-7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31431099/
8. Parveen B, Haq GS, Sheikh A. Routine versus selective episiotomy in primigravidae. Pak J Surg. 2018 Dec;28(4):285-90.
9. Xu XY, Wang HY, Su L. Women’s sexual health after delivery and its related influential factors. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2019;11:1673-8225.
10. Leal I, Lourenco S, Oliveira R, Carvalheira A, Maroco J. Sexual function in women after delivery: Does episiotomy matter? J Sex Med. 2018 May;6(5):356-63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29633325/
11. Boran SU, Cingez H, Erma O, Erkaya S. Episiotomy and the development of postpartum dyspareunia and anal incontinence in nulliparous females. Eurasian J Med. 2019 Apr;45:176-80. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30975878/
12. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan;1:CD000081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3/full
13. Hassan S, Mahmood T, Akbar N, et al. Postpartum dyspareunia: a meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Mar;21:44-52. doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01203-9. Available from: https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-021-01203-9
14. Taylor B, Lee KA, Smyth RM, Greer IA. Postpartum dyspareunia and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2021 Feb;128(2):180-189. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16490. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32982564/
15. Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M, Talebian A, Sadat Z, Kazemirad S. The effect of mediolateral episiotomy on postpartum dyspareunia: A prospective cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;148(1):77-82. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13005. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31834626/
16. Rosen NO, Dawson SJ, Brooks M, et al. Predictors of dyspareunia after vaginal delivery with or without episiotomy. J Sex Med. 2020 Aug;17(8):1551-1561. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.017. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32738387/
17. Franchi M, Poggi P, Bussani C, et al. Long-term outcomes after episiotomy: perineal pain and sexual function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;247:234-240. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.017. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32743309/
18. Vanneste Y, De Leeuw JW, Schuurmans N, Lagro-Janssen AL. Measurement tools for postpartum dyspareunia: A critical review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Dec;40(4):294-303. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2019.1641598. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31631523/
19. Santos J, Ribeiro C, Martins H, et al. Sexual function 6 months after vaginal delivery: episiotomy vs spontaneous perineal tears. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul;22(1):355. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04780-3. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-022-04780-3
20. Ismail SI, Shah NM, Alkatout I, et al. Risk factors for postpartum dyspareunia: a multicenter cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Sep;32(9):2379-2388. doi:10.1007/s00192-020-04572-x. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32698741/
21. Yassini E, Jannati Y, Rezaei E, et al. Prevalence and predictors of postpartum sexual dysfunction in Iranian women. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Jun;29:100639. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100639. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33909479/
22. Silveira ML, Ertel KA, Dole N, Chasan-Taber L. Association of maternal postpartum depression with dyspareunia: a cross-sectional study. Matern Child Health J. 2020 May;24(5):553-559. doi:10.1007/s10995-020-02890-1. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32162638/
23. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215
24. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 165: Prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;128(1):e1-e15. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27320367/
25. Kettle C, Tohill S. Restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb;2:CD000081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3/full
26. Serati M, Salvatore S, Siesto G, et al. Female sexual function after delivery: short and long-term perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;79:71-81. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.02.005. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35343452/
27. Sutherland G, Faramarzi M, Najafi S, et al. Reporting and measurement bias in studies of dyspareunia: a methodological review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Aug;155(2):254-261. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13591. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33600007/
28. Jardine J, Walker K, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Outcomes of episiotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021 Feb;372:n155. doi:10.1136/bmj.n155. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33551691/
29. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears. Green-top Guideline No. 29. London: RCOG; 2022. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/the-management-of-third-and-fourth-degree-perineal-tears-green-top-guideline-no-29/
30. World Health Organization. Episiotomy policy for vaginal birth: evidence brief. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240019680
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metrics
How to Cite
