Comparison Between The Risk of Wound Infection in Peri-Umbilical Incision with Intra-Umbilical Incision in Laparoscopic Procedures

Authors

  • Muhammad Mazher Irshad Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar
  • Kausar Noor Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar
  • Muhammad Imran Khan Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar
  • Ahmad Yar Khan Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar
  • Iqra Noor Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar
  • Rizwana Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/029

Keywords:

Appendectomy, Cholecystectomy, Incisional Wound Infection, Laparoscopy, Port Site Complications, Surgical Incisions, Surgical Wound Infection, Umbilicus, Wound Healing

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly preferred for various abdominal procedures due to its minimally invasive nature. However, port site complications, particularly wound infections, remain a significant concern. The method of umbilical access—either intra-umbilical or periumbilical—may influence the rate of postoperative infections, yet evidence comparing the two remains limited. The study aimed to compare the frequency of wound infection between intra-umbilical and periumbilical incisions in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy.

Methods: A descriptive study was conducted over six months in the Department of Surgery at Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. A total of 201 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries were enrolled using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Patients were divided into Group A (intra-umbilical incision, n=101) and Group B (periumbilical incision, n=100). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and type of surgery were recorded. Postoperative wound infections were assessed within two weeks based on predefined clinical criteria. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25, with Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests applied where appropriate.

Results: The overall wound infection rate was 11.4%, with 8 infections (7.9%) in Group A and 15 infections (15%) in Group B. The infection rate was nearly double in the periumbilical group compared to the intra-umbilical group. Other variables, including comorbidities and type of surgery, were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: Intra-umbilical incisions were associated with a lower incidence of wound infections compared to periumbilical incisions in laparoscopic procedures. This method may offer a safer and cosmetically superior alternative for initial port access in routine laparoscopic surgeries 

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Mazher Irshad , Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

    Department of General Surgery 

  • Kausar Noor, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

    Department of General Surgery 

  • Muhammad Imran Khan, Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar

    Department of General Surgery 

  • Ahmad Yar Khan, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

    Department of General Surgery 

  • Iqra Noor, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

    Department of General Surgery 

  • Rizwana, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

    Department of General Surgery 

References

References

1. Bessoff KE, Forrester JD. Appendicitis in Low-Resource Settings. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020;21(6):523-32.

2. Yin P, Teng S, Li H, Wang J, Liu Z. Association between body composition and incisional surgical site infection after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. BMC Surg. 2024;24(1):297.

3. Caroff DA, Chan C, Kleinman K, Calderwood MS, Wolf R, Platt R, et al. Combined laparoscopic and open colon surgery rankings fail to accurately rank hospitals by surgical-site infection rate. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44(4):624-30.

4. Yousaf A, Amjad H, Ulfat A, Munawar A, Chishti MA, Mehmood A. Comparative trial of periumbilical incision versus intraumbilical incision in Emergency laparoscopic appendectomy in a high volume laparoscopic surgery centre. JAIMC: Journal of Allama Iqbal Medical College. 2023.

5. Luo HM, Xiong YJ. Comparing surgical site wound infection after laparoscopic and open radical cystectomies in patients with bladder cancer. Int Wound J. 2024;21(4):e14718.

6. Keerthi M, Kore S, Togale M. A Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome of Periumbilical versus Intraumbilical Incision in Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy-A One Year Randomised Controlled Trial. Medical Research Archives. 2023.

7. Kurobe M, Sugihara T, Harada A, Kaji S, Uchida G, Kanamori D, et al. The Comparison of Postoperative Umbilical Port Site-Related Complications Between Transumbilical and Periumbilical Incision After Laparoscopic Surgery in Children. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques Part A. 2023.

8. Utsumi M, Yamada T, Yamabe K, Katsura Y, Fukuchi N, Fukunaga H, et al. Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0274887.

9. Gómez Ruiz M, Espin-Basany E, Spinelli A, Cagigas Fernández C, Bollo Rodriguez J, María Enriquez Navascués J, et al. Early outcomes from the Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis study (MIRCAST). Br J Surg. 2023;110(9):1153-60.

10. Kong DS, Zhang HL, Zhao XL, Meng Y, Chai W, Wang ZY. Effect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy on the incidence of surgical-site wound infection: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2023;20(9):3682-9.

11. Stone R, Carey E, Fader AN, Fitzgerald J, Hammons L, Nensi A, et al. Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(2):179-203.

12. Liu J, Wang Q. Impact of surgical site infection after open and laparoscopic surgery among paediatric appendicitis patients: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21(4):e14524.

13. Matsukuma S, Tokumitsu Y, Nakagami Y, Shindo Y, Matsui H, Nakajima M, et al. Laparoscopic resection reduces superficial surgical site infection in liver surgery. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(12):7131-41.

14. Hernandez A, Petersen R. Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2023;103(5):947-60.

15. Shi Z. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery: A comparative analysis of wound infection rates and recovery outcomes. Int Wound J. 2024;21(3):e14474.

16. Cuevas-Toledano J-F, Picazo-Yeste J, Moreno-Sanz C. Modified Intraumbilical Versus Infraumbilical Entry Method at Laparoscopy: A Cohort Study. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2021;32:21-7.

17. Gamo GO, Reichardt GS, Guetter CR, Pimentel SK. RISK FACTORS FOR SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION AFTER ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022;35:e1655.

18. de'Angelis N, Schena CA, Moszkowicz D, Kuperas C, Fara R, Gaujoux S, et al. Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(1):24-46.

19. Alganabi M, Biouss G, Pierro A. Surgical site infection after open and laparoscopic surgery in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021;37(8):973-81.

20. Wang XB, Lin JM, Chen YP, Ye XX. Surgical site wound infection and pain after laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Int Wound J. 2023;20(8):3262-70.

21. Shih S-L, Chen B-H, Tam K. Transumbilical versus periumbilical incision for laparoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis. American journal of surgery. 2020.

22. Awan WS, Farrukh R, Bilqees U, Khan AH, Jillani AA, Mahmood K. Transumblical versus infraumblical pneumoperitoneum: a comparative study. Professional Med J. 2020; 27(2):388-94.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Irshad MM, Noor K, Khan MI, Khan AY, Noor I, Rizwana. Comparison Between The Risk of Wound Infection in Peri-Umbilical Incision with Intra-Umbilical Incision in Laparoscopic Procedures. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 29 [cited 2026 Jun. 4];14(4). Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/3935

Similar Articles

11-20 of 366

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.