Role of Flexible Ureterorenoscope with Holmium Laser in Larger Renal Stones of Size 10-35mm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/022Keywords:
Ureteroscopy, Holmium Lasers , Kidney Calculi, Lithotripsy , Laser, Treatment OutcomeAbstract
Background: Management of larger renal stones (10–35 mm) remains challenging, with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) often considered the standard. This study aimed to evaluate the role of a flexible ureterorenoscope with a holmium laser in treating larger renal stones, specifically those measuring 10-35mm.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, from June 1, 2023, to May 30, 2024, after obtaining ethical approval. A total of 70 patients aged 18–65 years with renal stones sized 10–35 mm was included through non-probability consecutive sampling. All patients underwent preoperative clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, and imaging. Procedures were performed by consultant urologists using flexible ureterorenoscopy with Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.
Results: The patients were 60% male and had an average age of 44.8 ± 12.3 years. 18.7 mm was the average stone size. In 82.9% of instances, a ureteral access sheath was utilized, and the average operating time was 72.4 ± 18.2 minutes. At 4 weeks, 24.3% of patients had residual fragments larger than 2 mm, whereas 75.7% of patients were stone-free. Significant correlations were found between leftover pieces and larger stone size (p≤0.001), lower-pole placement (p≤0.003), and longer operative duration (p≤0.001).
Conclusion: A safe and efficient minimally invasive procedure for kidney stones 10–35 mm in size, flexible ureterorenoscopy with a Holmium: YAG laser offers good stone-free rates and low morbidity, especially in properly chosen patients.
References
1. Dai JC, Pearle MS. Diet and Stone Disease in 2022. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 13;11(16):4740. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164740.
2. Awedew AF, Han H, Berice BN, Dodge M, Schneider RD, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of urolithiasis in 204 countries and territories, 2000–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;78. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102924.
3. Lang J, Narendrula A, El-Zawahry A, Sindhwani P, Ekwenna O. Global Trends in Incidence and Burden of Urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study Data. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Jan 3;35:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.008.
4. He M, Dong Y, Cai W, Cai J, Xie Y, Yu M, Li C, Wen L. Recent advances in the treatment of renal stones using flexible ureteroscopys. Int J Surg. 2024 Jul 1;110(7):4320-4328. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001345.
5. Setthawong V, Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Pattanittum P. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4.
6. Ripa F, Tokas T, Griffin S, Ferretti S, Bujons Tur A, Somani BK. Role of Pediatric Ureteral Access Sheath and Outcomes Related to Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation: A Systematic Review of Literature. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Oct 12;45:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.012.
7. Akpayak IC, Ikeh CD. Outcome of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the Management of Renal Stones: A two‑year Retrospective Study. Nigerian Journal of Medicine. 2023;32(3):275-9. Doi: 10.4103/NJM.NJM_43_23
8. Nour H, Elmansy H, Ali A, Alshamsi Y, Hodhod A, Mogharbel A, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy for large renal stones: Are we pushing the limits: A multi-center retrospective analysis. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery. 2024;43(3):855-60. DOI: 10.21608/EJSUR.2024.357136
9. Wang QL, Liu JQ, Cao J, Ding J. Clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney stones: A retrospective comparative study. World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 26;12(21):4483-4490. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4483.
10. Mitroi GF, Drăgoescu PO, Mitroi MR, Mitroi GG, Dudan IB, Popescu TCT, Nedelcuță CM, Drocaș AI. Clinical Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Flexible Ureteroscopy as an Outpatient Procedure: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 7;14(9):1131. doi: 10.3390/life14091131.
11. Kozubaev B, Oguz Demirdogen S, Aksakalli T, Ozkaya F, Adanur S. Comparison of thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney Stone treatment: A randomized prospective study. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2025 Jul 7:501808. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501808.
12. Sussman J, Ganesan V, Borofsky MS, Price CL, Ratanawong JP, Dahm P. Ureteroscopic thulium versus holmium laser fragmentation for renal and ureteral stones in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023; Oct 25;2023(10):CD015675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015675
13. Delbarre B, Baowaidan F, Culty T, Khelfat L, Brassier M, Ferragu M, Magnier A, Secourgeon A, Tariel F, Lebdai S, Bigot P. Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Mar 21;51:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.012.
14. Pietropaolo A, Geraghty RM, Veeratterapillay R, Rogers A, Kallidonis P, Villa L, Boeri L, Montanari E, Atis G, Emiliani E, Sener TE, Al Jaafari F, Fitzpatrick J, Shaw M, Harding C, Somani BK. A Machine Learning Predictive Model for Post-Ureteroscopy Urosepsis Needing Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Case-Control YAU Endourology Study from Nine European Centres. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 29;10(17):3888. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173888.
15. Scarcella S, Tiroli M, Torino G, Mariscoli F, Cobellis G, Galosi AB. Combined treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal calculi with robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and laser lithotripsy in children: Case report and non-systematic review of the literature. Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2246. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2246.
16. Huang JS, Xie J, Huang XJ, Yuan Q, Jiang HT, Xiao KF. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater: A single institutional experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22704. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022704.
17. Damaskos C, Garmpis N, Psilopatis I, Dimitroulis D. Natural Ending or Surgical Complication: Is It the Time to Reconsider the Clavien-Dindo Classification System? Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Dec;17(4):939-947. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.939.
18. Maugeri O, Dalmasso E, Peretti D, Venzano F, Chiapello G, Ambruosi C, Dadone C, Bonaccorsi A, Pepe P, D'Arrigo L, Pennisi M. Stone free rate and clinical complications in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): Our experience in 571 consecutive cases. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021 Oct 1;93(3):313-317. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2021.3.313.
19. Xun Y, Chen M, Liang P, Tripathi P, Deng H, Zhou Z, Xie Q, Li C, Wang S, Li Z, Hu D, Kamel I. A Novel Clinical-Radiomics Model Pre-operatively Predicted the Stone-Free Rate of Flexible Ureteroscopy Strategy in Kidney Stone Patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Oct 15;7:576925. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.576925.
20. Zeinelabden KM, Abdelhalim E, Galal M, Abdelbaky T, Nabeeh H. Flexible ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of lower pole renal hard stones ≤ 2 cm: a prospective randomized study. BMC Urol. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01644-z.
21. Yang B, Sun S, Wang J, Wang J, Liu S, Wei Y, Yang X. Novel scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 1;103(44):e40390. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040390.
22. Yu S, Liu L, Li Y, Zhou L, Chen J, Li H, Wang K. Flexible ureteroscopic treatment of kidney stones: How do the new laser systems change our concepts? Asian J Urol. 2024 Apr;11(2):156-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.11.001.
23. Tonyali S, Haberal HB, Esperto F, Hamid Z, Tzelves L, Pietropaolo A, Emiliani E. The Prime Time for Flexible Ureteroscopy for Large Renal Stones Is Coming: Is Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy No Longer Needed? Urol Res Pract. 2023 Sep;49(5):280-284. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.23142.
24. Yazici CM, Gönen KA, Ozman O, Cakir H, Basatac C, Akgul HM, Cinar O, Siddikoglu D, Dayısoylu HS, Sancak EB, Baseskioglu B, Onal B, Akpinar H. Determining the Stone Free Rate of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Which Radiological Technique? RIRSearch Study Group. Urology. 2024 May;187:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.071.
25. Rammah AM, Khaled F, Zamel S, Elkady A, Morsy S, Abdelwahab M. The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy for large volume stones and hazards of ureteral access sheath usage: A prospective randomized study. Arab J Urol. 2024 Sep 12;23(1):62-69. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2398378.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metrics
How to Cite
