Psychosocial and Behavioral Risk Factors of Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Case-Control Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-3/027Keywords:
Peptic Ulcer Disease, Peptic ulcer, Psychological Stress, Depression, Risk FactorsAbstract
Background: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is influenced by physiological, psychological, and lifestyle factors. While H. pylori infection and NSAID use are known etiologies, the impact of stress, depression, and unhealthy habits remains underexplored. This study evaluated the association of stress and depression with PUD in Sindh.
Method: This case-control study included 278 participants (139 cases, 139 controls). Data were collected through patient history and validated surveys. Stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), depression via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), smoking exposure through pack-years, and alcohol dependence using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Statistical analyses, including t-tests and chi-square tests, were performed to determine significant associations between PUD and various risk factors.
Results: The mean age was 43 ± 8.3 years, with cases being significantly older than controls (p=0.001). Depression was more prevalent in PUD cases (p=0.001), with 57.9% reporting moderate-to-severe symptoms. High stress (≥27 on PSS) was significantly associated with PUD (p<0.001). PUD cases had greater smoking history (12.7 ± 5.7 vs. 7.2 ± 4.1 pack-years, p=0.001) and alcohol use (p=0.001). NSAID use increased PUD risk (p<0.001). Urban residency (p=0.001), sedentary lifestyle (p=0.001), and poor sleep (p=0.001) were significantly associated with PUD. Stress correlated with alcohol use (r=0.46), smoking (r=0.49), and poor sleep (r=0.61).
Conclusions: Stress, depression, and unhealthy behaviors significantly contribute to PUD risk. Addressing these modifiable factors through stress management and lifestyle interventions may reduce disease burden. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in larger populations.
References
1. Ryan D, Barquera S, Barata Cavalcanti O, Ralston J. The global pandemic of overweight and obesity: addressing a twenty-first century multifactorial disease. In: Kickbusch I, Franz C, editors. Handbook of Global Health. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 739–73. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-45009-0_39
2. Wang R, Li Z, Liu S, Zhang D. Global, regional, and national burden of 10 digestive diseases in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1061453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1061453
3. Srivastav Y, Kumar V, Srivastava Y, Kumar M. Peptic ulcer disease (PUD), diagnosis, and current medication-based management options: schematic overview. J Adv Med Pharm Sci. 2023;25(11):14–27. doi: 10.9734/JAMPS/2023/v25i11651
4. Vakil N. Peptic ulcer disease: a review. JAMA. 2024;332(21):1832–42. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.19094
5. Maqbul MS, Alzaki RS, Meeralam RS, Alqutami NA, Alturki BM, Alhazmi LS, et al. Prevalence of peptic ulcer disease and its associated factors in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2025;3(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.gande.2024.09.001
6. Ko KA, Lee D-K. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced peptic ulcer disease. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2025;25(1):34–41. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2025.0004
7. Dong SXM. A novel psychopathological model explains the pathogenesis of gastric ulcers. J Ment Health Clin Psychol. 2022;6(3):13–24. doi: 10.29245/2578-2959/2022/3.1259
8. Mai NTP, Mai NTT. An association of psychosocial characteristics and severity of ulcers in adolescents with chronic peptic ulcer disease. Tap Chi Nghien Cuu Y Hoc. 2023;166(5E12):36–43. doi: 10.52852/tcncyh.v166i5E12.1124
9. Rafiq M, Rizwan M, Hammad M, Javed HIA, Lashari MH, Ali K. Incidence and risk factors associated with peptic ulcer in different cities of Punjab, Pakistan. Biomed Lett. 2024;10(1):51–8. doi: 10.47262/BL/10.1.20240416
10. Lanas A, Chan FKL. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):613–24. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32404-7
11. Dong SXM. Painting a complete picture of the pathogenesis of peptic ulcers. J Ment Health Clin Psychol. 2022;6:32–43. doi: 10.29245/2578-2959/2022/3.1261
12. Ren J, Jin X, Li J, Li R, Gao Y, Zhang J, et al. The global burden of peptic ulcer disease in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(5):1666–76. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac033
13. Xie X, Ren K, Zhou Z, Dang C, Zhang H. The global, regional and national burden of peptic ulcer disease from 1990 to 2019: a population-based study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02130-2
14. Chen K-C, Kuo C-Y, Tsai W-L, Wu Y-J, Geng J-H, Kuo C-H, et al. Association between menopause, postmenopausal hormone therapy and peptic ulcer disease in Taiwanese population. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5457012/v1
15. Li Z, Chen H, Chen T. Genetic liability to obesity and peptic ulcer disease: a Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med Genomics. 2022;15(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12920-022-01366-x
16. Chen C-C, Geng J-H, Wu P-Y, Huang J-C, Hu H-M, Chen S-C, et al. High obesity indices are associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but low obesity indices are associated with peptic ulcer disease in a large Taiwanese population study. Obes Facts. 2024;17(5):491–501. doi: 10.1159/000540281
17. Liu Y, Xiao Z, Ye K, Xu L, Zhang Y. Smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, body mass index, and peptic ulcer risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. 2023;13:992080. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.992080
18. Kannan S. The evolving e-cigarette: a comparison narrative of cigarette smoke and e-cigarette vapour on sleep. J Health Sci Med Res. 2024:20241131. doi: 10.31584/jhsmr.20241131
19. Zha L-F, Dong J-T, Wang J-L, Chen Q-W, Wu J-F, Zhou Y-C, et al. Effects of insomnia on peptic ulcer disease using Mendelian randomization. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021(1):2216314. doi: 10.1155/2021/2216314
20. Yokoyama A, Iwata Y, Oe N, Tadaka E. Gender analysis of stress and smoking behavior: a survey of young adults in Japan. Soc Sci. 2024;13(3):128. doi: 10.3390/socsci13030128
21. Rojas‐Carvajal M, Sequeira‐Cordero A, Brenes JC. The environmental enrichment model revisited: a translatable paradigm to study the stress of our modern lifestyle. Eur J Neurosci. 2022;55(9–10):2359–92. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15160
22. Onoh L. The role of non-modifiable risk factors for peptic ulcer disease in patients attending a tertiary hospital in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Int J Health Saf Environ. 2020;6(2):494–8.
23. Ghanadi K, Anbari K. Risk factors of peptic ulcer disease in Khorramabad city, Southwest of Iran: a case-control study. World Fam Med. 2018;16(1):133–8.
24. Leone A, De la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Mas MV, Sayon-Orea C, Menichetti F, Martínez-Gonzalez MA, et al. Association between the consumption of ultra-processed foods and the incidence of peptic ulcer disease in the SUN project: a Spanish prospective cohort study. Eur J Nutr. 2024:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03439-2
25. Al Shboul S, Maloul O, Al-Trad H, Maloul Y, AlHarahsheh W, Mosallam D, et al. Self-reported gastrointestinal symptoms associated with NSAIDs and caffeine consumption in a Jordanian subpopulation. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(9):1519. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091519
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metrics
How to Cite
