A Systematic Review of Advanced Imaging Modalities for Bladder Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Strengths and Limitations

Authors

  • Saba Maqsood Avicenna Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Omair Siddique Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. 
  • Aftab Ahmed Sheikh khalifa bin Zaid Hospital/ Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad, AJK, Pakistan. 
  • Saba Akram Avicenna Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Hassan Raza Asghar Avicenna Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Pakeeza Shafiq College of Medicine, Northern Border University, KSA
  • Muhammad Arsalan Shah University of Florence, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1773-2623

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-3/079

Keywords:

Bladder Cancer, Optical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging, PET, CT, MRI

Abstract

Background: Bladder cancer was seen to be amongst the most common urological malignancies, which required very sensitive approaches of detection that were also reliable for grading to improve patient outcomes. Diagnostic potential of various imaging modalities such as Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS), Blue Light Cystoscopy (BLC), Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) were explored. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of these imaging modalities to detect and stage bladder cancer to improve treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Methods: The review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The published research was found in PubMed and Web of Science databases from August to November 24, 2024. Studies were included if it used one of seven advanced imaging modalities with reported sensitivity and specificity. Studies were excluded if they were not in English and were animal based. Two independent reviewers selected studies and reported the sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities. Results were synthesized narratively by two independent reviewers. The QUADAS-2 assessment tool was used to assess risk or bias in the studies.

Results: Out of 112 articles, 41 studies were included. The sensitivity of mpMRI in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC varied from 88 to 95.4%. CEUS was found to be a noninvasive alternative for detecting lesions with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 90%, though operator dependency was noted. AI-augmented BLC achieved specificity from 88–95% for carcinoma in situ detection. CLE and OCT provided a real time means for lesion characterization, with OCT showing greater specificity (85–97.8%) than CLE (66.5–74.8%) for CIS. NBI and PET also showed promising accuracies.

Discussion: mpMRI and CEUS along with BLC had proven to be promising in the detection of bladder cancer sensitivity, while OCT had demonstrated the best CIS specificity. NBI and CLE were seen to be emerging techniques that had potential in resource limited settings but that needed further clinical validation. It was found that PET was crucial to detecting distant metastasis despite it being costly. Standardization and integration of these modalities into clinical practice would improve diagnostic precision as well as patient care.

Author Biographies

  • Saba Maqsood, Avicenna Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Radiology, 

  • Muhammad Omair Siddique, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. 

    Department of Anesthesia, 

  • Aftab Ahmed, Sheikh khalifa bin Zaid Hospital/ Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad, AJK, Pakistan. 

    Department of Urology,

  • Saba Akram, Avicenna Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Radiology,

  • Hassan Raza Asghar, Avicenna Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Urology, 

  • Pakeeza Shafiq, College of Medicine, Northern Border University, KSA

    Department of Surgery,


  • Muhammad Arsalan Shah, University of Florence, Italy

    Department of Biomedical Sciences,

References

Lobo N, Afferi L, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Porten S, Psutka SP, et al. Epidemiology, screening, and prevention of bladder cancer. European Urology Oncology. 2022 Dec 1;5(6):628-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.003

Pohar KS. Cystoscopy and enhanced diagnostics. Bladder Cancer: A Practical Guide. 2021:9-20. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_2

Chang S, Wintergerst GA, Carlson CJ, Yin H, Scarpato KR, Luckenbaugh AN, et al. Low-cost, label-free blue light cystoscopy through digital staining of white light cystoscopy videos. medRxiv. 2024:2024-03. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00705-6

Shkolyar E, Zhou SR, Carlson CJ, Chang S, Laurie MA, Xing L, et al. Optimizing cystoscopy and TURBT: enhanced imaging and artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Urology. 2024 Jul 9:1-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00904-9

Yoo JW, Koo KC, Chung BH, Baek SY, Lee SJ, Park KH, et al. Deep learning diagnostics for bladder tumor identification and grade prediction using RGB method. Scientific Reports. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):17699. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22612-0

Abouelkheir RT, Abdelhamid A, Abou El-Ghar M, El-Diasty T. Imaging of bladder cancer: standard applications and future trends. Medicina. 2021 Mar 1;57(3):220. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57030220

Morselli S, Baria E, Cicchi R, Liaci A, Sebastianelli A, Nesi G, et al. The feasibility of multimodal fiber optic spectroscopy analysis in bladder cancer detection, grading, and staging. Urologia Journal. 2021 Nov;88(4):306-14. DOI: 10.1177/03915603211057097

Zhao X, Ma Y, Lei Z. Advanced optical imaging technology in the near-infrared window for cell tracking in vivo. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2024 Dec 15;521:216178. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.216178

Kim LH, Patel MI. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Translational Andrology and Urology. 2020 Dec;9(6):3056. DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-620

Mostafid H, Kamat AM, Daneshmand S, Palou J, Taylor JA III, et al. Best practices to optimize quality and outcomes of transurethral resection of bladder tumors. European Urology Oncology. 2021 Feb 1;4(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.06.003

Huele EH, Veenboer PW, Wessels FJ, Jonges TN, Meijer RP. Value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of invasive urinary bladder tumors. Urol Oncol. 2023 Jan;41(1):49.e7-49.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.026.

Ge X, Lan ZK, Chen J, Zhu SY. Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detecting the staging and grading of bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Ultrason. 2021 Feb 18;23(1):29-35. DOI: 10.11152/mu-2730.

Beji S, Wrist Lam G, Østergren PB, Toxvaerd A, Sønksen J, Fode M. Diagnostic value of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy versus conventional endoscopic biopsies of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors: a pilot study. Scand J Urol. 2021 Feb;55(1):36-40. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1841285.

Tufano A, Rosati D, Moriconi M, Santarelli V, Canale V, Salciccia S, Sciarra A, Franco G, Cantisani V, Di Pierro GB. Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Detection of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Curr Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;31(2):818-827. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020060

Galgano SJ, Porter KK, Burgan C, Rais-Bahrami S. The Role of Imaging in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Staging. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 16;10(9):703. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10090703

Schoeb DS, Wollensak C, Kretschmer S, González-Cerdas G, Ataman C, Kayser G, Dressler FF, Gratzke C, Zappe H, Miernik A. Ex-vivo evaluation of miniaturized probes for endoscopic optical coherence tomography in urothelial cancer diagnostics. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 8;77:103597. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103597

Girard A, Vila Reyes H, Shaish H, Grellier JF, Dercle L, Salaün PY, Delcroix O, Rouanne M. The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Guiding Precision Medicine for Invasive Bladder Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 6;10:565086. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.565086.

Kriegmair MC, Rother J, Grychtol B, Theuring M, Ritter M, Günes C, Michel MS, Deliolanis NC, Bolenz C. Multiparametric Cystoscopy for Detection of Bladder Cancer Using Real-time Multispectral Imaging. Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):251-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.024

Das S, Gu L, Eve CT, Parrish J, De Hoedt AM, McKee C, Aronson W, Freedland SJ, Williams SB. The Impact of Blue Light Cystoscopy Use Among Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients in an Equal Access Setting: Implications on Recurrence and Time to Recurrence. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Dec;21(6):711.e1-711.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.04.011

Shalaby EA, Mohamed AR, Elkammash TH, Abouelkheir RT, Housseini AM. Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of urinary bladder cancer. Curr Urol. 2022 Sep;16(3):127-135. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000128.

Ali N, Bolenz C, Todenhöfer T, Stenzel A, Deetmar P, Kriegmair M, Knoll T, Porubsky S, Hartmann A, Popp J, Kriegmair MC, Bocklitz T. Deep learning-based classification of blue light cystoscopy imaging during transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 2;11(1):11629. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91081-x

Shahait M, Abu-Hijlih R, Farkouh A, Obeidat S, Salah S, Abdlkadir AS, Al-Ibraheem A. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET)-computed tomography (CT) in the initial staging of bladder cancer: a single institution experience. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2023 Jul 17;35(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s43046-023-00180-5

Sung HH, Scherr DS, Slaton J, Liu H, Feeny KL, Lingley-Papadopoulos C, Gearheart J, Zara JM, Lerner SP. Phase II multi-center trial of optical coherence tomography as an adjunct to white light cystoscopy for intravesical real time imaging and staging of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2021 Jul;39(7):434.e23-434.e29. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.026

Tang Y, Kortum A, Vohra I, Schwarz RA, Carns J, Kannady CR, Clavell-Hernandez J, Hu Z, Dhanani N, Richards-Kortum R. Initial Results of First In Vivo Imaging of Bladder Lesions Using a High-Resolution Confocal Microendoscope. J Endourol. 2021 Aug;35(8):1190-1197. DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0757

Chen C, Huang H, Zhao Y, Liu H, Luo Y, Sylvester RJ, Li JP, Lam TB, Lin T, Huang J. Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis with 5-aminolevulinic acid, hexaminolevulinate and narrow band imaging for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;11(5):1082-1093. DOI: 10.7150/jca.34527

Hu X, Li G, Wu S. Advances in diagnosis and therapy for bladder cancer. Cancers. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):3181. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133181

Godlewski D, Czech S, Bartusik-Aebisher D, Aebisher D. Bladder cancer basic study and current clinical trials. Uro. 2024 Sep 22;4(3):145-96. DOI: 10.3390/uro4030011

Kural S, Pathak AK, Singh S, Jain G, Yadav M, Agarwal S, et al. Prospective assessment of VI-RADS with muscle invasion in urinary bladder cancer and its implication on re-resection/restaging TURBT patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2024 Nov 4:1-0. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-13936-2

Contieri R, Soloway MS, Gontero P, Herr H, Kassouf W, Mertens LS, et al. Deintensification of treatment for low-grade bladder tumors: a collaborative review by the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG). European Urology Oncology. 2024 Aug 31. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.012

Halstuch D, Lotan P, Karchever I, Rubinshtein D, Kedar D, Baniel J, et al. Single-dose post-office fulguration mitomycin C instillation appears to improve recurrence-free survival in patients with low-grade noninvasive bladder cancer. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer. 2023 Oct 1;21(5):e320-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.06.013

Sharma G, Sharma A, Krishna M, Devana SK, Singh SK. Xpert bladder cancer monitor in surveillance of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2022 Apr 1;40(4):163-e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.017

Sugeeta SS, Sharma A, Ng K, Nayak A, Vasdev N. Biomarkers in bladder cancer surveillance. Frontiers in Surgery. 2021 Sep 28;8:735868. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.735868

Wong VK, Ganeshan D, Jensen CT, Devine CE. Imaging and management of bladder cancer. Cancers. 2021 Mar 19;13(6):1396. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061396

Yu G, Rice S, Heer R, Lewis R, Vadiveloo T, Mariappan P, et al. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour in participants with a first suspected diagnosis of intermediate-or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. European Urology Open Science. 2023 Jul 1;53:67-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.003

Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K, Mshs MD. Bladder cancer: a review. JAMA. 2020 Nov 17;324(19):1980-91. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.17598

Yang Y, Zou X, Wang Y, Ma X. Application of deep learning as a noninvasive tool to differentiate muscle-invasive bladder cancer and non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer with CT. European Journal of Radiology. 2021 Jun 1;139:109666. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109666

Laukhtina E, Shim SR, Mori K, David DA, Soria F, Rajwa P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of novel urinary biomarker tests in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. European Urology Oncology. 2021 Dec 1;4(6):927-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.07.003

Erikson MS, Petersen AC, Andersen KK, Jacobsen FK, Mogensen K, Hermann GG. Do repeated transurethral procedures under general anesthesia influence mortality in patients with non-invasive urothelial bladder cancer? A Danish national cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2020 Jul 3;54(4):281-9. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1792445

Del Giudice F, Pecoraro M, Vargas HA, Cipollari S, De Berardinis E, Bicchetti M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) inter-observer reliability: an added value for muscle invasive bladder cancer detection. Cancers. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):2994. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102994

Van Hoogstraten LM, Vrieling A, van der Heijden AG, Kogevinas M, Richters A, Kiemeney LA. Global trends in the epidemiology of bladder cancer: challenges for public health and clinical practice. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2023 May;20(5):287-304. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00684-8

Galgano SJ, Porter KK, Burgan C, Rais-Bahrami S. The role of imaging in bladder cancer diagnosis and staging. Diagnostics. 2020 Sep 16;10(9):703. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10090703

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Maqsood S, Siddique MO, Ahmed A, Akram S, Asghar HR, Shafiq P, et al. A Systematic Review of Advanced Imaging Modalities for Bladder Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Strengths and Limitations. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 21 [cited 2026 Jun. 11];14(3):631-9. Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/3413

Similar Articles

11-20 of 668

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)