A Systematic Review on Active Learning in Dentistry Education in Undergraduate Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd13-4/020Keywords:
Active Learning, Undergraduate, Dentistry, Classrooms.Abstract
Background: Former assessments of active learning in dental education have not offered a thorough research effort on this topic because of their strong focus on specific active learning strategies. We carried out a systematic review to map the breadth and depth of the literature on active learning strategies in undergraduate dental education.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review, the studies between January 2005 and October 2022 were included by using the databases of MEDLINE, ERIC, EMBASE, and Scopus. Original research articles in English that underwent peer review were selected. The articles that were not in English language and unrelated were excluded. Before extracting relevant material, two seasoned researchers independently verified the eligibility of whole texts, abstracts, and titles. Risk of Bias was assessed by using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. Results were synthesized qualitatively.
Results: The review of 93 articles assessed research using three methodologies: learning only, reaction assessment, and response and learning evaluations combined. Most studies used post-intervention evaluations, quantitative techniques, and self-report measures to assess student satisfaction and knowledge gain. Active learning approaches like group discussions, problem-based learning, team-based learning, and flipped learning were most commonly studied.
Conclusion: Active learning in undergraduate dentistry classes can enhance learning, but further research is needed to assess its impact on skill development and behavioral change.
References
Bonwell CC, Eison JA. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036–1183; 1991.
Knowles M. Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1984.
Pyle M, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, et al. ADEA Commission on change and innovation in dental education. The case for change in dental education. J Dent Educ. 2006;70(9):921–924.
Palatta AM, Kassebaum DK, Gadbury-Amyot CC, Karimbux NY, Licari FW, Nadershahi NA, et al. Change Is Here: ADEA CCI 2.0-A Learning Community for the Advancement of Dental Education. J Dent Educ. 2017; 81(6):640–648. doi: 10.21815/JDE.016.
Reimschisel T, Herring AL, Huang J, Minor TJ. A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education. Med Teach. 2017; 39(12):1227–1237. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1340636
Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421–44.
Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z [
Polyzois I, Claffey N, Mattheos N. Problem‐based learning in academic health education. A systematic literature review. European Journal of Dental Education. 2010;14(1):55–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00593.x
Vanka A, Vanka S, Wali O. Flipped classroom in dental education: A scoping review. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;24(2):213–226. doi: 10.1111/eje.12487
Bassir SH, Sadr-Eshkevari P, Amirikhorheh S, Karimbux NY. Problem-based learning in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(1):98–109.
Eslami E, Bassir SH, Sadr-Eshkevari P. Current state of the effectiveness of problem-based learning in prosthodontics: a systematic review. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(5):723–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Huang B, Zheng L, Li C, Li L, Yu H. Effectiveness of problem-based learning in Chinese dental education: a meta-analysis. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(3):377–83.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology. 2005;8(1):19–32.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating Training Program: The Four Level. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publisher; 1998.
Dong H, Guo C, Zhou L, Zhao J, Wu X, Zhang X, et al. Effectiveness of case-based learning in Chinese dental education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e048497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048497
Gianoni-Capenakas S, Lagravere M, Pacheco-Pereira C, Yacyshyn J. Effectiveness and Perceptions of Flipped Learning Model in Dental Education: A Systematic Review. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(8):935–945. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.109
Woldt JL, Nenad MW. Reflective writing in dental education to improve critical thinking and learning: A systematic review. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(6):778–785. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12561
Webster F, Krueger P, MacDonald H, Archibald D, Telner D, Bytautas J, et al. A scoping review of medical education research in family medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:79. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0350-1
Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 1998.
Esene IN, Mbuagbaw L, Dechambenoit G, Reda W, Kalangu KK. Misclassification of Case-Control Studies in Neurosurgery and Proposed Solutions. World Neurosurg. 2018;112:233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.171
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23(4):334–40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g
Frye AW, Hemmer PA. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e288–99. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
Kogan JR, Shea JA. Course evaluation in medical education. Teach Teacher Educ. 2007;23(3):251–264.
Pope C, Mays N, editors. Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. [Google Scholar]
Kuwaiti AA. Health Science students’ evaluation of courses and Instructors: the effect of response rate and class size interaction. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2015;9(1):51–60.
American Dental Education Association Commission on Change and Innovation in Dental Education. Beyond the crossroads: change and innovation in dental education. [Internet]. Washington, DC: American Dental Education Association, 2009.[cited 2023 March 5].
Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education. 2004;93(3):223–31.
McGrath C. Behavioral Sciences in the Promotion of Oral Health. J Dent Res. 2019; 98(13):1418–1424. doi: 10.1177/0022034519873842
Centore L. Trends in Behavioral Sciences Education in Dental Schools, 1926 to 2016. J Dent Educ 2017;81(8):eS66–eS73. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.009
Perez A, Green JL, Ball GDC, Amin M, Compton SM, Patterson S. Behavioural change as a theme that integrates behavioural sciences in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2022; 26(3):453–458. doi: 10.1111/eje.12720
Trullàs JC, Blay C, Sarri E, Pujol R. Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8
Zhang H, Liao AWX, Goh SH, Wu XV, Yoong SQ. Effectiveness of peer teaching in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;118:105499. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105499
Gelis A, Cervello S, Rey R, Llorca G, Lambert P, Franck N, et al. Peer Role-Play for Training Communication Skills in Medical Students: A Systematic Review. Simul Healthc. 2020;15(2):106–111. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000412
Mitchell J, Brackett M. Dental Anatomy and Occlusion: Mandibular Incisors-Flipped Classroom Learning Module. MedEdPORTAL. 2017. May 24;13:10587. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10587
Omar E. Perceptions of Teaching Methods for Preclinical Oral Surgery: A Comparison with Learning Styles. Open Dent J. 2017;11:109–119. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010109
Gali S, Shetty V, Murthy NS, Marimuthu P. Bridging the gap in 1(st) year dental material curriculum: A 3 year randomized cross over trial. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15(3):244–9. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.161565
Ihm J, Choi H, Roh S. Flipped-learning course design and evaluation through student self-assessment in a predental science class. Korean J Med Educ. 2017;29(2):93–100. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.56
Kim M, Roh S, Ihm J. The relationship between non-cognitive student attributes and academic achievements in a flipped learning classroom of a pre-dental science course. Korean J Med Educ. 2018;30(4):339–346. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2018.109
Luchi KC, Montrezor LH, Marcondes FK. Effect of an educational game on university students’ learning about action potentials. Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41(2):222–230. doi: 10.1152/advan.00146.2016
Almajed A, Skinner V, Peterson R, Winning T. Collaborative learning: Students’ perspectives on how learning happens. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. 2016;10(2):9.
Ha-Ngoc T, Park SE. Peer Mentorship Program in Dental Education. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. 2015;4(2):104–9.
Park SE, Kim J, Anderson N. Evaluating a Team-Based Learning Method for Detecting Dental Caries in Dental Students. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. 2014;3(2):100–5.
Miller CJ, McNear J, Metz MJ. A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37(4):347–55. doi: 10.1152/advan.00050.2013
Khan S. Effect of active learning techniques on students’ choice of approach to learning in Dentistry: a South African case study. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2011;25(3):491–509.
Kieser J, Livingstone V, Meldrum A. Professional storytelling in clinical dental anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(2):84–9. doi: 10.1002/ase.20 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Reich S, Simon JF, Ruedinger D, Shortall A, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R. Evaluation of two different teaching concepts in dentistry using computer technology. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(3):321–9. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9004-8
Qutieshat AS, Abusamak MO, Maragha TN. Impact of Blended Learning on Dental Students’ Performance and Satisfaction in Clinical Education. J Dent Educ. 2020;84(2):135–142. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.167
Ashwini KM, Devi RG, Jyothipriya A. A survey on the student engagement in physiology education among dental students. Drug Invention Today, 2019;1666–1668.
Kohli S, Sukumar AK, Zhen CT, Yew ASL, Gomez AA. Dental education: Lecture versus flipped and spaced learning. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16(5):289–297.
Tricio J, Montt J, Orsini C, Gracia B, Pampin F, Quinteros C, et al. Student experiences of two small group learning-teaching formats: Seminar and fishbowl. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(2):151–158. doi: 10.1111/eje.12414
Tauber Z, Cizkova K, Lichnovska R, Lacey H, Erdosova B, Zizka R, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the presentation of virtual histology slides by students during classes. Are there any differences in approach between dentistry and general medicine students? Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(2):119–126. doi: 10.1111/eje.12410
Himida T, Nanjappa S, Yuan S, Freeman R. Dental students’ perceptions of learning communication skills in a forum theatre-style teaching session on breaking bad news. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(2):95–100. doi: 10.1111/eje.12407
Slaven CM, Wells MH, DeSchepper EJ, Dormois L, Vinall CV, Douglas K. Effectiveness of and Dental Student Satisfaction with Three Teaching Methods for Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(8):966–972. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.091
Park SE, Salihoglu-Yener E, Fazio SB. Use of team-based learning pedagogy for predoctoral teaching and learning. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(1):e32–e36. doi: 10.1111/eje.12396
Yang Y, You J, Wu J, Hu C, Shao L. The Effect of Microteaching Combined with the BOPPPS Model on Dental Materials Education for Predoctoral Dental Students. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(5):567–574. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.068
Veeraiyan D, Rangalakshmi S, Subha M. Peer assisted team-based learning in undergraduate dental education. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019. a; 10. 607–611. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v10i1.1890
Veeraiyan D, Manoharan, Subha M, Ramesh A. Conventional lectures vs the flipped classroom: Comparison of teaching models in undergraduate curriculum. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019. b; 10(1). 572–576. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v10i1.1913
Veeraiyan D, Solete P, Subha M. Comparative study on conventional lecture classes versus flipped class in teaching conservative dentistry and endodontics. International journal of research in pharmaceutical sciences. 2019. c;10(1), 689‐693. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v10i1.1904
Veeraiyan D, Abhinav, Subha M. Flipped classes and its effects on teaching oral and maxillofacial surgery. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019. d; 10. 677–680. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v10i1.1902
Al-Madi EM, Celur SL, Nasim M. Effectiveness of PBL methodology in a hybrid dentistry program to enhance students’ knowledge and confidence. (a pilot study). BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1392-y
Chutinan S, Riedy CA, Park SE. Student performance in a flipped classroom dental anatomy course. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018. Aug;22(3):e343–e349. doi: 10.1111/eje.12300
Jones TA. Effect of Collaborative Group Testing on Dental Students’ Performance and Perceived Learning in an Introductory Comprehensive Care Course. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(1):88–93. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.011
Xiao N, Thor D, Zheng M, Baek J, Kim G. Flipped classroom narrows the performance gap between low-and high-performing dental students in physiology. Advances in physiology education. 2018;42(4):586–92. doi: 10.1152/advan.00104.2018
Varthis S, Anderson OR. Students’ perceptions of a blended learning experience in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22(1):e35–e41. doi: 10.1111/eje.12253
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
How to Cite
