Standard Pressure Vs Low Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparative Insights into a Tertiary Healthcare Setting in Lahore

Authors

  • Imdad Ahmad Zahid Services Institute of Medical Sciences / Services Hospital, Jail Road,Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Haris Janjua King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • Farhan Javaid Jinnah Hospital Lahore .Pakistan
  • Nazia King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ayra Suleman King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hasan Muhammad Saeed DHQ Hospital Okara, DHQ Hospital Okara City

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/089

Keywords:

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Laparoscopy, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) had been taken as the standard of care in the treatment of the gallbladder disease. Another alternative that could be put in place of countering the undesirable side effects associated with the LC was the low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LPLC). This study was done to compare the performance of SPLC and LPLC based on the postoperative pain, operating time and occurrence of shoulder tip pain.

Methods: A total of one hundred and eighty patients undergoing elective LC were randomised into SPLC group (n=90) or the LPLC group (n=90). Sampling was done using the Open Epi 3.0.0 with CI of 95 and power of 80. The postoperative pain was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours of operation. The pain at the tip of the shoulder and length of surgery were recorded as well. All statistical procedures have been performed in SPSS 25.0.

Results: The mean operative time was similar in both the SPLC and LPLC groups (35.40 ± 8.94 minutes vs. 37.40 ± 7.89 minutes, p=0.1125). Postoperative pain scores were lower in the LPLC group at all measured time points (p=0.0001). The frequency of shoulder tip pain was notably reduced in the LPLC group 6 (6.67%) compared to the SPLC group 23 (25.56%). SPSS version 26.0 was used with p-value<0.05.

Conclusion: LPLC offered significant advantages over SPLC by reducing the postoperative pain as well as the incidence of shoulder tip pain without altering the operative time.

Author Biographies

  • Imdad Ahmad Zahid, Services Institute of Medical Sciences / Services Hospital, Jail Road,Lahore, Pakistan


    Surgical Unit – II

  • Muhammad Haris Janjua, King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan

    East Surgical ward

  • Farhan Javaid, Jinnah Hospital Lahore .Pakistan

    Surgical Unit 3

  • Nazia, King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan

    East Surgical ward

  • Ayra Suleman, King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan


    East Surgical ward

  • Hasan Muhammad Saeed, DHQ Hospital Okara, DHQ Hospital Okara City

    Department of Surgery

References

1. Rashdan M, Daradkeh S, Al-Ghazawi M, Abuhmeidan JH, Mahafthah A, Odeh G, et al. Effect of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on pain and inflammation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Res Notes. 2023 Sep 28;16(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06492-y.

2. Gautam N, Harjai M, Sharma P, Rai S, Tripathi M, Malviya D, et al. Anaesthetic Management and Physiologic Effects of Pneumoperitoneum in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Cureus. 2023 Oct 4;15(10):e46458. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46458.

3. Ortenzi M, Montori G, Sartori A, Balla A, Botteri E, Piatto G, Gallo G, et al. Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7092-7113. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09201-1.

4. Tian F, Sun X, Yu Y, Zhang N, Hong T, Liang L, et al. Comparison of low-pressure and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities: a double blinded randomized clinical trial. BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02606-w.

5. Adenuga AT, Olakada F, Ojo C, Aniero J. Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 1;27(6):754-758. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_802_23.

6. Chang W, Yoo T, Cho WT, Cho G. Comparing postoperative pain in various pressure pneumoperitoneum of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 May;100(5):276-281. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.5.276.

7. Arumugaswamy PR, Chumber S, Rathore YS, Maitra S, Bhattacharjee HK, Bansal VK, et al. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular blockade versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a non-inferiority randomized control trial. Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):449-459. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10558-0.

8. Gaiwal S, Palep JH, Mirkute R, Prasad N, Kush M. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for enhanced recovery after surgery: A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Apr 1;21(2):147-152. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_69_24.

9. Saway JP, McCaul M, Mulekar MS, McMahon DP, Richards WO. Review of Outcomes of Low Verses Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery. Am Surg. 2022 Aug;88(8):1832-1837. doi: 10.1177/00031348221084956.

10. Gail MH, Haneuse S. Power and sample size for multivariate logistic modeling of unmatched case-control studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):822-834. doi: 10.1177/0962280217737157.

11. Park SE, Hong TH. Effects of extremely low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on postoperative recovery after single site robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 22;408(1):242. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02988-0.

12. Shaha A, Shirsath K, Yelke V. To evaluate post-operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure (10mmHg CO₂) versus standard pressure (14mmHg CO₂) pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a one-year randomized controlled trial hospital-based study. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2024 Feb 11;8(S1):268–73. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v8nS1.14691

13. Temtanakitpaisan A, Temtanakitpaisan T, Pratipanawatr C, Buppasiri P, Somjit M. Additional low-pressure pulmonary recruitment for reducing post-laparoscopic shoulder pain in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Mar;67(2):253-260. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23197.

14. Meletti JFA, Fernandes MG, Moro ET, Marchi E. Quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial of pneumoperitoneum pressure and neuromuscular blockade depth. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 29;75(6):844667. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844667.

15. Barazanchi AWH, MacFater WS, Rahiri JL, Tutone S, Hill AG, Joshi GP; PROSPECT collaboration. Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;121(4):787-803. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.023.

16. Gin E, Lowen D, Tacey M, Hodgson R. Reduced Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Pressure During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Effect on Post-operative Pain: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov;25(11):2806-2813. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04919-0.

17. Koç A, Memiş U, Onk D, Karataş T, Gazi M, Sayar AC, et al. Impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and deep neuromuscular blockade on surgeon satisfaction and patient outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients: A prospective randomised controlled study. J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Apr 1;21(2):183-188. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_78_24.

18. Pan X, Wang D. Effect of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Mar;41(3):719-723. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.3.11348.

19. Saremirad M, Yazdimoghaddam H, Dalili A, Rastaghi S. The Impact of Incentive Spirometry on Shoulder Tip Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Sep 27;32(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001012.

20. • Abdallah HA, Kabbash M, Saad M. Comparative study of low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Egyptian Journal of Surgery. 2024;43(1):147-152. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_272_23.

21. • Lu K, Peng X, et al. Low pneumoperitoneum pressure facilitates postoperative pain relief and gastrointestinal function recovery in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2025. doi: 10.1186/s12408-9922

22. • Hamid M, et al. Comparison of low versus high intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal resection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Unknown. 2024. doi: 10.1002/sp443

23. • Albers KI, et al. The effect of low- versus normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2020;21:444. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04496-8.

24. • Kassem M, Emam M, Abd El-Maksoud MA. Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2019;75(3):2499-2504. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.31076.

25. • Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014; (Issue 4). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006930.pub3.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Zahid IA, Janjua MH, Javaid F, Nazia, Suleman A, Saeed HM. Standard Pressure Vs Low Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparative Insights into a Tertiary Healthcare Setting in Lahore. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 29 [cited 2026 Jun. 4];14(4). Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/4245

Similar Articles

21-30 of 135

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)