Cross Sectional Evaluation of Pre-operative Predictive Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Muhammad Haseeb Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6570-2555
  • Shaheer Hassan Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Abdullah Ayub Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Mian Afaq Ali Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Javed Shakir Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Shahid Farooq King Edward Medical University, Lahore. Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-3/005

Keywords:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Preoperative Period, Risk Factors, Cholecystitis.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic gallbladder removals are performed in several cases, though complications can necessitate the conversion to open surgery. The identification of risk factors for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) enhances surgical planning and patient safety. The objective of the study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, and imaging parameters in patients with cholecystitis that may predict the difficulty of LC.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Unit I of the Department of Surgery at Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, between March and May 2025, under ethical approval (FMH-IRB-1637).  A total of 72 patients diagnosed with cholecystitis aged from 16 to 65 years of age and underwent LC for cholecystitis were included using a consecutive sampling technique. Demographic, clinical, and imaging information was collected using a standardized proforma. The dates of intraoperative findings, duration of operation, conversion to open surgery, and postoperative results were noted. Chi-square and t-tests were used to perform statistical analysis with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results: Difficult LC was encountered in 24 (of the 72 patients. Factors with the largest predictive effect were patients who were ≥50 (18 (75.0%)), had obesity (14 (58.3%)), a past abdominal operation (11 (45.8%)), had experienced ERCP (6 (25.0%)), and presented with thickening of the gallbladder (17 (70.8%)) along with dilation of the CBD (6 (25.0%). Cases that were more difficult had surgeries that lasted longer (mean 95.3 ± 20.1 min compared to 54.7 ± 15.6 min; p<0.001), involved more open conversions (6 (25.0 %) versus 0 (0%); p<0.001), and had more post-operative complications.

Conclusion: Many pre-operative factors, such as age, being obese, having previous surgery, and unusual imaging results, give hints that a patient will suffer from difficult LC. By identifying these signs, surgeons can prepare patients for counseling, sort risks, and make decisions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Haseeb, Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Surgery,

  • Shaheer Hassan , Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Surgery,

  • Abdullah Ayub , Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Surgery,

  • Mian Afaq Ali , Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Surgery,

  • Muhammad Javed Shakir , Fatima Memorial Hospital & College, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Department of Surgery,

  • Muhammad Shahid Farooq , King Edward Medical University, Lahore. Pakistan.

    Department of Surgery,

References

1. Mannam R, Sankara Narayanan R, Bansal A, Yanamaladoddi VR, Sarvepalli SS, Vemula SL, et al. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2023 Sep 21;15(9):e45704. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45704.

2. Al Masri S, Shaib Y, Edelbi M, Tamim H, Jamali F, Batley N, et al. Predicting Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Single Institution Retrospective Study. World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2373-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4513-1.

3. Ramírez-Giraldo C, Isaza-Restrepo A, Conde Monroy D, Castillo-Barbosa AC, Rubio-Avilez JJ, Van-Londoño I. What is the best score for predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A diagnostic trial study. Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):1871-1879. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000354.

4. Alvarado-Valenzuela K, Ramírez-Giraldo C, Isaza-Restrepo A, Navarro-Alean J. Predicting the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on a preoperative scale. Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):969-977. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01216-y.

5. Di Martino M, Mora-Guzmán I, Jodra VV, Dehesa AS, García DM, Ruiz RC, et al. How to Predict Postoperative Complications After Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: the Chole-Risk Score. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov;25(11):2814-2822. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04956-9.

6. Di Buono G, Romano G, Galia M, Amato G, Maienza E, Vernuccio F, et al. Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and preoperative predictive factors. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81938-6.

7. Djote SM, Muhie DA, Alemayehu GD. Advancing laparoscopy in resource-limited settings. BMC Surg. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02387-2.

8. Marcellinaro R, Rocca A, Avella P, Grieco M, Spoletini D, Carlini M. How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center. Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02173-6.

9. Serban D, Socea B, Balasescu SA, Badiu CD, Tudor C, Dascalu AM, et al. Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis in the Elderly: A Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Intra and Postoperative Complications. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 2;57(3):230. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030230.

10. Bhardwaj R, Agrawal U, Vashist P, Manna S. Determination of sample size for various study designs in medical research: A practical primer. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Jul;13(7):2555-2561. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1675_23.

11. Xie ZQ, Li HX, Tan WL, Yang L, Ma XW, Li WX, et al. Association of Cholecystectomy With Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis Among Adults in the USA: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 30;8:787777. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.787777.

12. Karim ST, Chakravarti S, Jain A, Patel G, Dey S. Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Predictors and its Significance: Our Experience. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Oct-Dec;12(4):56-63. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_162_22.

13. Wong A, Naidu S, Lancashire RP, Chua TC. The impact of obesity on outcomes in patients undergoing emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1091-1096. doi: 10.1111/ans.17513.

14. Lucocq J, Nassar AHM. The effects of previous abdominal surgery and the utilisation of modified access techniques on the operative difficulty and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4559-4570. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10949-x.

15. Fu JN, Liu SC, Chen Y, Zhao J, Ma T. Analysis of risk factors for complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Heliyon. 2023 Aug 3;9(8):e18883. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18883.

16. Maheta BJ, Manhas P, Niu A, Ong L, Ramsamooj A, Karashchuk I, et al. What Should I Use? Impact of Adhesion Barriers on Postoperative Abdominal Complications: A Systematic Review. Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):3082-3091. doi: 10.1177/00031348241258718.

17. Liao Y, Cai Q, Zhang X, Li F. Single-stage intraoperative ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus preoperative ERCP Followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 11;101(10):e29002. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029002.

18. Khan I, Yadav P, Saran RK, Sharma S, Sharma AK. A Study of the Degree of Gall Bladder Wall Thickness and Its Impact on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Cureus. 2023 May 14;15(5):e38990. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38990.

19. Björk D, Bartholomä W, Hasselgren K, Edholm D, Björnsson B, Lundgren L. Malignancy in elective cholecystectomy due to gallbladder polyps or thickened gallbladder wall: a single-centre experience. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;56(4):458-462. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1884895.

20. Pallaneeandee NK, Govindan SS, Zi Jun L. Evaluation of the Common bile duct (CBD) Diameter After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Retrospective Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Feb 1;33(1):62-68. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001135.

21. Reinsoo A, Kirsimägi Ü, Kibuspuu L, Košeleva K, Lepner U, Talving P. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomies: an 11-year population-based study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct;49(5):2269-2276. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02190-9.

22. Guiab K, Evans T, Brigode W, Stamelos G, Sebekos K, Siddiqi M, et al. Complications After Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Effect of Surgeon Experience, Procedure Volume, and Other Surgeon-Based Characteristics. Am Surg. 2022 Aug;88(8):1798-1804. doi: 10.1177/00031348221084083.

23. Li H, Luo TF, Zhang NR, Zhang LZ, Huang X, Jin SQ. Factors associated with prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 24;22(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01886-4.

24. Magnano San Lio R, Barchitta M, Maugeri A, Quartarone S, Basile G, Agodi A. Preoperative Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):408. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010408.

25. Shimoda M, Kuboyama Y, Suzuki S. Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1611-1616. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01266-w.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

Metrics

How to Cite

1.
Haseeb M, Hassan S, Ayub A, Ali MA, Shakir MJ, Farooq MS. Cross Sectional Evaluation of Pre-operative Predictive Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. PJMD [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 21 [cited 2026 Jun. 4];14(3):24-30. Available from: https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/3884

Similar Articles

31-40 of 433

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.