IMPACT AND SATISFACTION WITH E-CONSULTATION: A PERCEPTION OF ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

Authors

  • Mubashir siddiqui Occupational Therapist Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Karachi

Keywords:

Rehabilitation, Consultation, COVID-19, Health, ADLs, Healthcare.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The havoc caused by COVID-19 around the world has infected millions with uncertainty and fear amid social distancing and lock down measures to control the spread of pandemic. This leads to have an adverse impact on medical priorities for consultation in a quandary. However, e-consultation has been used widely by worldwide practitioners to aid the patient and healthcare providers.

 

METHODOLOGY                  

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on allied health professionals, considering physical and occupational therapists. A self-administered questionnaire regarding impact assessment and level of attained satisfaction was distributed to participants in Google Docs via email or Whatsapp groups.

 

RESULTS

A total number of 109 responses obtained from the participants including 64 (58.7%) females and 45 (41.3%) males respectively with highest responses reported form 20-25 years (44%).The findings of this study showed that e-consultation services provided by therapists showed that (34.9%) were agreed to understand the completed condition of the patient, (38.5%) but (41.3%) disagreed to treat the patient same as physical appointment and (35.58%) disagreed to work more productively. Only (32.1%) were agreed to be satisfied during their consultation, (4.6%) were agreed to be satisfied of their devised treatment plan but (26.6%) remain convinced that they were unable to understand the complete condition of the patient during e-consultation. Consecutively, (49.5%) agreed that e-consultation can never be adopted as a good substitute of physical appointments.

 

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that limited number of therapists were satisfied with their e-consultation services while majority were agreed that the service cannot be a good substitute for a physical appointment. Therefore, further trials needs to be conducted to evaluate the factors causing hindrance in healthcare delivery. Moreover, it is important to make the service functional and provide adequate information and training for its easy access and implementation.

 

References

Rajani A, Khan MH. Career and service structure of allied health science in pakistan, a perspective in question. PJR. 2016 Jul 1;18(3).

Andermann A. Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals. Cmaj. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E474-83.

Paracha PI, Hameed A, Simon J, Jamil A, Nawab G. Prevalence of Anaemia in Semi-Urban Areas of Peshawar, Pakistan-A Challenge for Health Professionals and Policy Makers. Journal-Pakistan medical association. 1997 Feb 1;47:49-53.

Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58.

Saxon RL, Gray MA, Oprescu FI. Extended roles for allied health professionals: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare. 2014;7:479.

Speyer R, Denman D, Wilkes-Gillan S, Chen YW, Bogaardt H, Kim JH, Heckathorn DE, Cordier R. Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2018 Mar 5;50(3):225-35.

Edwards HB, Marques E, Hollingworth W, Horwood J, Farr M, Bernard E, Salisbury C, Northstone K. Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England. BMJ open. 2017 Nov 1;7(11).

Liddy C, Rowan MS, Afkham A, Maranger J, Keely E. Building access to specialist care through e-consultation. Open Medicine. 2013;7(1):e1.

Lai L, Liddy C, Keely E, Afkham A, Kurzawa J, Abdeen N, Audcent T, Bromwich M, Brophy J, Carsen S, Fournier A. The impact of electronic consultation on a Canadian tertiary care pediatric specialty referral system: A prospective single-center observational study. PloS one. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190247.

Caffery LJ, Smith AC. A literature review of email-based telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010 Jan 1;161:20-34.

Banks J, Farr M, Salisbury C, Bernard E, Northstone K, Edwards H, Horwood J. Use of an electronic consultation system in primary care: a qualitative interview study. British Journal of General Practice. 2018 Jan 1;68(666):e1-8.

Gibson S, McCrea J, Morgan S. Northern Ireland Waiting Time Statistics.

Keely E, Liddy C, Afkham A. Utilization, benefits, and impact of an e-consultation service across diverse specialties and primary care providers. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2013 Oct 1;19(10):733-8.

Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Rasmussen P, Pierson R, Applebaum S. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health affairs. 2012 Dec 1;31(12):2805-16.

Tran C, Liddy C, Pinto N, Keely E. Impact of question content on e-consultation outcomes. TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH. 2016 Mar 1;22(3):216-22.

Angstman KB, Rohrer JE, Adamson SC, Chaudhry R. Impact of e-consults on return visits of primary care patients. The health care manager. 2009 Jul 1;28(3):253-7.

Bichel A, Erfle S, Wiebe V, Axelrod D, Conly J. Improving patient access to medical services: preventing the patient from being lost in translation. Healthc Q. 2009 Jan 1;13(Spec. Issue):61-8.

Rushakoff RJ, Woeber KA. Evaluation of a “formal” endocrinology curbside consultation service: Advice by means of the internet, fax, and telephone. Endocrine Practice. 2003 Mar 1;9(2):124-7.

Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, Frémont P, Gagnon J, Tremblay N, Légaré F. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. Journal of medical systems. 2012 Feb;36(1):241-77.

Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The milbank quarterly. 2004 Dec;82(4):581-629.

Farr M, Banks J, Edwards HB, Northstone K, Bernard E, Salisbury C, Horwood J. Implementing online consultations in primary care: a mixed-method evaluation extending normalisation process theory through service co-production. BMJ open. 2018 Mar 1;8(3).

Fagerlund AJ, Holm IM, Zanaboni P. General practitioners’ perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: a qualitative interview study. BMJ open. 2019 May 1;9(5):e028251.

Katz SJ, Moyer CA, Cox DT, Stern DT. Effect of a triage‐based e‐mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of general internal medicine. 2003 Sep;18(9):736-44.

Leong SL, Gingrich D, Lewis PR, Mauger DT, George JH. Enhancing doctor-patient communication using email: a pilot study. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2005 May 1;18(3):180-8.

Lugtenberg M, Pasveer D, van der Weijden T, Westert GP, Kool RB. Exposure to and experiences with a computerized decision support intervention in primary care: results from a process evaluation. BMC family practice. 2015 Dec;16(1):1-0.

Published

2021-07-06

How to Cite

siddiqui, M. (2021). IMPACT AND SATISFACTION WITH E-CONSULTATION: A PERCEPTION OF ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS. Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation, 10(2). Retrieved from http://ojs.zu.edu.pk/ojs/index.php/pjr/article/view/1097

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.